ArticleCureus2020
The Current Practice of Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgical Treatment Among Spine Surgeons in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScoliosis is a spinal deformity consisting of lateral curvature and rotation of the vertebrae. The goal of corrective scoliosis surgery is to restore alignment of the spine and maintain motion. However, there is no global agreement among spine surgeons on the best method of surgical intervention, and little is known about the variations in practice among spine surgeons in Saudi Arabia.
objectivesThe aim of this study is to examine the current surgical practices relating to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and to establish the degree of variation and consensus among spine surgeons in Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted among spine surgeons in Saudi Arabia, using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire addressed four areas: surgeons' demographics, pre-operative assessment, operative assessment, and infection control practices. There were a total of 27 questions. Data was analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
resultsA total of 150 surgeons were included in this study. Of these, 73 responded to the questionnaire (response rate: 48.6%), 46 (63.01%) of whom were fellows. All respondents were males, and 37 (51.39%) were aged between 30 and 40 years. Fifty five (75.34%) were orthopedic surgeons. The most commonly used pre-operative health assessment test was an echocardiogram. Sixty six (90%) surgeons requested scoliosis anteroposterior (AP) view and lateral radiograph for curvature between 40 degrees and 90 degrees, and 65 (89%) requested it for curvature greater than 90 degrees. For the posterior construct, 29 (45.31%) did not use cross-links for fewer than 10 levels, and 23 (35.94%) did not use cross-links for more than 10 levels. In addition to a local bone graft, the most commonly used transplant method was allograft 37 (50.68%). Fifty five (85.94%) respondents favored an all-screw pedicle construct over a hybrid construct.
conclusionA large variation in surgical practices was observed. This was especially apparent in practices including the use of cross-links, intra-operative cell salvage, and the intra-operative use of traction. Some degree of variation was observed in pre-operative imaging assessment practices. Surgical guidelines should be developed to build a consensus among surgeons. A unified surgical training curriculum may help in achieving this goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.