Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224629›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2020

Heterologous prime-boost immunization co-targeting dual antigens inhibit tumor growth and relapse.

Qianqian Guo, Lizheng Wang, Ping Xu, Fei Geng, Jie Guo, Ling Dong, Xin Bao, Yi Zhou, Mengfan Feng, Jiaxin Wu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Qianqian GuoNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lizheng WangNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ping XuNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Fei GengNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jie GuoNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Ling DongNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xin BaoNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yi ZhouNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Mengfan FengNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jiaxin WuNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hui WuNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Bin YuNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Haihong ZhangNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xianghui YuNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Wei KongNational Engineering Laboratory for AIDS Vaccine, School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to induce an effective immune response against cancer, and the effectiveness of these vaccines is influenced by the choice of immunogen, vaccine type, and immunization strategy. Although treatment with cancer vaccines can improve tumor burden and survival, in most animal studies, it is challenging to achieve a complete response against tumor growth and recurrence, without the use of other therapies in combination. Here, we present a novel approach where dual antigens (survivin and MUC1) are co-targeted using three DNA vaccines, followed by a single booster of a recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine. This heterologous vaccination strategy induced higher levels of interferon (IFN)-γ-secretion and stronger antigen-specific T-cell responses than those induced individually by the DNA vaccines and the MVA vaccine in mice. This strategy also increased the number of active tumor-infiltrating T cells that efficiently inhibit tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice. Heterologous DNA prime-MVA boost immunization was capable of inducing a robust antigen-specific immune-memory, as seen from the resistance to subsequent survivin- and MUC1-expressing tumors. Moreover, the therapeutic effects of DNA prime-MVA boost and DNA prime-adenovirus boost strategies were compared. DNA prime-MVA boost immunization performed better, as indicated by the T effector ratio and the induction of Th1 immunity. This study provides the basis for the use of heterologous DNA prime-MVA boost vaccination regime targeting two antigens simultaneously as a promising immunotherapeutic strategy against cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsVaccines, DNAAnimalsImmunizationMiceRecurrenceVaccinationVaccinia virusVaccines, DNAcancer vaccineImmunotherapyMUC1prime-boostsurvivin

Identifiers

PMID33224629
PMCPMC7657584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.