ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020
Correlation of whole-bone marrow dual-time-point
Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis onClinical & experimental metastasis · 2023Review
- The CAR-HEMATOTOX score as a prognostic model of toxicity and response in patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Article
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Multiple Myeloma in a Post-Treatment Setting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Venous thromboembolism detected by FDG-PET/CT in cancer patients: a common, yet life-threatening observation.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Deep learning convolutional neural network (DLCNN): unleashing the potential ofAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The practical application of dual-time-point-imaging (DTPI) technique still remains controversial. One of the issues is that current parameters of DTPI quantification suffer from some deficiencies, mainly limited sampling of the diseased sites by confining measurements to specific locations. We aimed to examine the correlation between the percent change from early to delayed scans in whole-bone marrow (WBM)
Indexed as
Identifiers
33224622PMC7675111W3107699399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.