ArticleInternational journal of burns and trauma2020
Comparative study of the neck shaft angle in femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures in north part of Iran.
Article in International journal of burns and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Distribution of Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal (CCD) Angles in the Iranian Elderly Population: Implications for Proximal Femoral Nail Design.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of proximal femoral geometry and its relationship with body mass index in Iranian people: a cross sectional study.International journal of burns and trauma · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA femur fracture is accounted for as one of the most common fractures in the population. The femoral neck has had an angle with the longitudinal axis of the bone shaft, which is defined as neck- shaft angle (NSA). Regional epidemiologic information about NSA might be useful for orthopedic surgeons. In the present study, we aimed conduct a comparative study of NSA in patients with femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures in Rasht, Iran.
methodsThe study population consisted of all patients with hip fractures. Patients with femoral fractures (neck and intertrochanteric) were examined by an emergency medicine specialist at the time of admission. An Anterior-Posterior X-ray image was taken at the time of admission. Patients NSA was measured by expert orthopedic surgeons and was compared between patients.
resultsIn the present study, we evaluated the data of 80 patients with femoral fractures and 40 healthy individuals as control group. Patients were divided into two groups of femoral neck fractures (40 patients) and intertrochanteric fractures (40 patients). Analysis of the NSA showed no significant differences between the NSA of patients with neck and intertrochanteric fractures and also control group (P>0.05). Our data showed that the mean NSA in patients with femoral neck fractures were 131.04±3.7° degrees while the NSA of patients with intertrochanteric fractures were 132.07±4.1°. The NSA of controls were also 132.8±6.9°. We also found no significant differences between the NSA of different age groups or between male and female patients.
conclusionThe results of this study showed that no significant differences could be indicated between NSA of healthy subjects and patients with femoral fractures. We believe that paradoxical results of former reports could be due to population and regional factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33224610PMC7675205W3107676642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.