ReviewForensic sciences research2020
Disaster victim identification operations with fragmented, burnt, or commingled remains: experience-based recommendations.
Review in Forensic sciences research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The use of orthopedic surgical devices for forensic identification: A systematic review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Based Panoramic Radiograph Retrieval from Antemortem Images for Forensic Identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Determining the utility of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology for disaster victim identification (DVI).Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Development of a new semi-quantitative method of palatal rugae analysis to personal identification: a pilot study and protocol proposal.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Bone Marrow as a Source of DNA in Forensic Genetics: An Optimized Nucleic Acids Extraction Protocol.Genes · 2026Article
- Between memory and oblivion: the complex experiences of ZAKA volunteers during the Israel-Hamas war ("Swords of Iron").Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- CRISP: Cremated remains inference of sex probabilities - A software for Bayesian sex estimation in human cremated remains.PloS one · 2026Article
- Curvature-based 3D dental comparison to identify trauma-induced surface changes in human teeth: a forensic comparison studyThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2025Article
- From theory to practice: Protocol adaptations for swift victim identification in the forensic response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas massacre.Journal of forensic sciences · 2025Article
- Forensic odontology in the search of dental evidence at the scene of events with incinerated victims: a scoping review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- Beyond the flames: understanding the impact of loss without body recovery or identification in fire-related mass disaster contexts.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Nanoparticle-assisted PCR: fundamentals, mechanisms, and forensic implications.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Review
- The oral fingerprint: rapid 3D comparison of palatal rugae for forensic identification.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Piece by piece-a computer-aided method for virtual re-association of commingled fragmented remains.Forensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Sex Differentiation of Trabecular Bone Structure Based on Textural Analysis of Pelvic Radiographs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Operational Health Pavilions in Mass Disasters: Lessons Learned from the 2023 Earthquake in Turkey and Syria.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Understanding the challenges of disaster victim identification: perspectives of Australian forensic practitioners.Forensic sciences research · 2023Article
- Multidisciplinary Forensic Approach in "Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Palatal Rugae Patterns in Fars, Turkmen, and Sistani Ethnicities in the Eastern Part of the Caspian Littoral of Iran.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human-made and natural disasters can result in severely fragmented, compromised, and commingled human remains. The related disaster victim identification (DVI) operations are invariably challenging, with the state of the remains potentially precluding some identifications. Practitioners involved in these DVI operations will routinely face logistical, practical, and ethical challenges. This review provides information and guidance derived from first-hand experiences to individuals tasked with managing DVI operations with fragmented human remains. We outline several key issues that should be addressed during disaster preparedness planning and at the outset of an operation, when incident-specific strategies are developed. Specific challenges during recovery and examination of fragmented remains are addressed, highlighting the importance of experienced specialists at the scene and in the mortuary. DNA sample selection and sampling techniques are reviewed, as well as downstream effects of commingling and contamination, which can complicate reconciliation and emphasise the need for rigorous quality control. We also touch on issues that may arise during communication with families. While recommendations are provided, they are not intended as proscriptive policy but rather as an addition to the general recommendations given in the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) DVI Guide, to inform preparative discussions between government officials, judiciary, police, and forensic specialists.Key pointsA DVI operation for an incident characterised by many fragmented and otherwise compromised human remains poses specific challenges that may prolong and complicate identifications.Specialists should be consulted at the outset to address key issues related to the aim and extent of the operation.Specialist expertise in handling compromised human remains is indispensable at the scene, in the mortuary, during reconciliation, and for quality control.Continuous consultation between representatives from government, the judiciary, law enforcement, the media, and various forensic specialists will prevent unnecessary delay and facilitate accurate and timely communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.