Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224403›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2020

Lab on a rod: Size-based particle separation and sorting in a helical channel.

Joshua Palumbo, Maryam Navi, Scott S H Tsai, Jan K Spelt, Marcello Papini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua PalumboDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada.
Maryam Navi
Jan K Spelt
University of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Size-based particle separation using inertial microfluidics in spiral channels has been well studied over the past decade. Though these devices can effectively separate particles, they require a relatively large device footprint with a typical outer channel radius of approximately 15 mm. In this paper, we describe a microfluidic device with a footprint diameter of 5.5 mm, containing a helical channel capable of inertial particle separation fabricated using abrasive jet micromachining. The separation of particles in several channel geometries was studied using wide-field fluorescence microscopy. A maximum separation efficiency of approximately 90% was achieved at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min with a purity of approximately 95% at the outlet, where large particles were collected. An accompanying computational fluid dynamics model was developed to allow researchers to quickly assess the separation capability of their helical or spiral devices.

Identifiers

PMID33224403
PMCPMC7661098
OpenAlexW3103040132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.