Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224377›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2020

A Retrospective Study of Stromal Vascular Fraction Cell Therapy for Osteoarthritis.

Brian Mehling, Milan Hric, Adriana Salatkova, Robert Vetrak, Doreen Santora, Miriama Ovariova, Renata Mihalyova, Marine Manvelyan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Midterm results of intra-articular stromal vascular fraction injection for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian MehlingBHI Therapeutic Sciences, 214 State Street, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA.
Milan HricMalacky Hospital, Nemocnicna, Duklianskych hrdinov 34, 901 22 Malacky, Slovakia.
Adriana SalatkovaMalacky Hospital, Nemocnicna, Duklianskych hrdinov 34, 901 22 Malacky, Slovakia.
Robert VetrakMalacky Hospital, Nemocnicna, Duklianskych hrdinov 34, 901 22 Malacky, Slovakia.
Doreen SantoraBHI Therapeutic Sciences, 214 State Street, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA.
Miriama OvariovaBlue Horizon International, Grosslingova 17, 801 29 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Renata MihalyovaBlue Horizon International, Grosslingova 17, 801 29 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Marine ManvelyanBHI Therapeutic Sciences, 214 State Street, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA.
Hackensack University Medical Center · USNemocnica Malacky · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is progressive degenerative damage to articular cartilage. Current therapeutic options are reduced to control the OA-associated symptoms, leaving the degenerative changes to progress until a joint replacement becomes mandatory. Therefore, therapeutic alternatives are warranted to improve the patient's quality of life. Cell-based therapy is a developing therapeutic modality, showing promising results in the regeneration of injured cartilage and reduction of on-going inflammation within the affected joint. The current retrospective chart review study was aimed to analyze changes in pain and mobility of subjects with OA after stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cell therapy.

methodsThree hundred fifty subjects with hip and knee OA, treated with autologous SVF cells at the Malacky Hospital (Bratislava, Slovakia) in the period from 2015 to 2018, were included in the retrospective chart review study.

resultsSeven days after SVF cell therapy, 45.2% of subjects experienced improved pain levels and mobility. Three, 6, and 12 months after therapy, improvement in pain levels reached 75.3%, 84.4%, and 84.9%, and improvement in mobility reached 75.2%, 84.4%, and 84.9%.

conclusionsOur study of 350 subjects with hip and knee OA showed a significant improvement in pain levels and mobility 3, 6, and 12 months compared to 7 days after autologous SVF cell administration. The treatment demonstrated a strong safety profile with no severe adverse events or complications reported. The results of the study are showing that SVF cell therapy was more effective in subjects with arthritis stage III compared to arthritis stages I, II, and IV.

Indexed as

AutologousCell therapyMesenchymal stem cellsOsteoarthritisPlatelet-rich plasmaStromal vascular fraction

Identifiers

PMID33224377
PMCPMC7665865
OpenAlexW3094784858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.