ReviewGastroenterology research2020
A Focused Review on Advances in Risk Stratification of Malignant Polyps.
Review in Gastroenterology research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distilling Knowledge in Gastroenterology: An Artificial Intelligence System for Assisting Colonoscopy and Pathology Report Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- Predictive factors for the coexistence of colorectal lateral spreading tumors and colorectal polyps, and risk factors for malignancy.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Molecular Landscape of Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumors: From Endoscopic Subtypes to Molecular Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Immunohistochemical insights into the pathogenesis of colonic sessile serrated lesions.Archive of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances in microRNAs as Emerging Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Early Detection and Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: From benign to malignant polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021Review
- Colorectal malignant polyps: a modern approach.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both men and women in the United States, with most cases arising from precursor adenomatous polyps. Colorectal malignant polyps are defined as cancerous polyps that consist of tumor cells invading through the muscularis mucosae into the underlying submucosa (pT1 tumor). It has been reported that approximately 0.5-8.3% of colorectal polyps are malignant polyps, and the potential for lymph node metastasis in these polyps ranges from 8.5% to 16.1%. Due to their clinical significance, recognition of malignant polyps is critical for clinical teams to make treatment decisions and establish appropriate surveillance schedules after local excision of the polyps. There is a rapidly developing interest in malignant polyps within the literature as a result of an increasing number of identifiable adverse histologic features and recent advancements in endoscopic treatment techniques. The purpose of this paper is to have a focused review of the recent histopathologic literature of malignant polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.