Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33224137›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Bacterial-Based Strategies to Hydrolyze Gluten Peptides and Protect Intestinal Mucosa.

Fernanda Cristofori, Ruggiero Francavilla, Daniela Capobianco, Vanessa Nadia Dargenio, Simone Filardo, Paola Mastromarino

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Novel probiotic preparation withMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Rye (Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The potentials of probiotics on gluten hydrolysis; a review study.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fernanda CristoforiInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine-Pediatric Section, Università di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Ruggiero FrancavillaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine-Pediatric Section, Università di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Daniela CapobiancoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Università La Sapienza di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Vanessa Nadia DargenioInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine-Pediatric Section, Università di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Simone FilardoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Università La Sapienza di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Paola MastromarinoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Università La Sapienza di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gluten is a mixture of proteins highly resistant to hydrolysis, resulting in the emergence of toxic peptides responsible for gluten-related disorders. Currently, a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the unique proven therapy for celiac disease (CD). Several research groups and pharmaceutical companies are developing new nondietetic therapeutic strategies for CD. Probiotics are viable microorganisms thought to have a healthy effect on the host. The proteolytic mechanism of lactic acid bacteria comprises an extracellular serine protease, di- and oligopeptide-specific transport systems, and several intracellular peptidases that might affect gluten degradation. Therefore, probiotic supplementation is an attractive therapy because of its possible anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Several studies have been performed to assess the effectiveness of various specific probiotic strains, showing positive effects on immune-modulation (inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α) restoring gut microbiota and decrease of immunogenic peptides. The present review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the ability of probiotic strain (single or mixtures) to digest gliadin peptides in vitro and to modulate the inflammatory response in the gut.

Indexed as

AnimalsCeliac DiseaseDiet, Gluten-FreeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGlutensHumansHydrolysisIntestinal MucosaProbioticsGlutensceliac diseasegluten digestiongluten hydrolysismicrobiotaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID33224137
PMCPMC7669986
OpenAlexW3095315064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.