Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33223814›Full record

ArticleNigerian journal of surgery : official publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society

A Comparative Study of Fine-Needle Aspiration and Nonaspiration Cytology Diagnosis in Thyroid Lesions.

Elangovan Archana, Chellappa Vijayakumar, Nagarajan Raj Kumar, Gopal Balasubramanian, Krishnamachari Srinivasan, G S Sreenath, N Siddaraju

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nigerian journal of surgery : official publication of the Nigerian Surgical Research Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elangovan ArchanaDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Chellappa VijayakumarDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Nagarajan Raj KumarDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Gopal BalasubramanianDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Krishnamachari SrinivasanDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
G S SreenathDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
N SiddarajuDepartment of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAspiration cytology is one of the first-line diagnostic tests in thyroid malignancies. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in thyroid lesions causes hemorrhagic smear and cell trauma, often leading to the repetition of smear and delay in diagnosis. This study was conducted to identify the diagnostically superior technique with regard to thyroid swelling and to assess the quality of smears obtained from FNAC and fine-needle nonaspiration cytology (FNNAC). METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective diagnostic study carried out for 2 years in a tertiary care center from South India. All patients with complaints of thyroid swellings, after examination, underwent FNNAC, followed by FNAC of the lesion. They underwent thyroidectomy when indicated. The final postoperative biopsy reports were compared with the preoperative reports of these two techniques (FNNAC and FNAC). The quality of smears was compared using Mair's score.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in diagnosing malignancy were 93.4%, 100%, 100%, 98.78%, and 98.96% for FNNAC and 94.12%, 100%, 100%, 98.82%, and 99% for FNAC, respectively, which were comparable. Regarding the quality of smears, FNNAC had more smears with less blood in the background. FNAC had more smears with adequate cellularity. The difference in overall Mair's score between the two techniques was not significant (

conclusionNo difference was found in the accuracy of FNAC and FNNAC in diagnosing thyroid lesions. Furthermore, the smear quality of both techniques was comparable. Hence, either can be used based on the operator's preference and experience.

Indexed as

Aspiration cytologyfine-needle aspiration cytologyMair's scorenonaspirationthyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33223814
PMCPMC7659761
OpenAlexW3107247540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.