Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33223626›Full record

ReviewJournal of cleaner production2021

COVID-19 pandemic lessons to facilitate future engagement in the global climate crisis.

Krystal M Perkins, Nora Munguia, Michael Ellenbecker, Rafael Moure-Eraso, Luis Velazquez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cleaner production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Public trust and mistrust of climate science: A meta-narrative review.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. From the COVID-19 pandemic to corrupt practices: a tale of two evils.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Climate change during the COVID-19 outbreak: scoping future perspectives.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krystal M PerkinsPsychology, School of Natural and Social Sciences Purchase College, State University of New York, 735 Anderson Hill Rd, Purchase, NY, 10577, USA.
Nora MunguiaSustainability Graduate Program/Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Colonia Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Michael EllenbeckerOccupational and Environmental Hygiene, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Co-Director Massachusetts Toxic Use Reduction Institute, The Offices at Boott Mills West 126 John Street, Suite 14, Lowell, MA, 01852, USA.
Rafael Moure-ErasoOccupational and Environmental Hygiene, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 100 Pawtucket Street Lowell, MA, USA.
Luis VelazquezSustainability Graduate Program/Industrial Engineering, University of Sonora, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Colonia Centro, 83000, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in January 2020. As of November 2020, over 54 million cases and over 1 million deaths have been reported globally. The sudden coronavirus global pandemic has also pointed to the importance of tackling the global climate crisis even more urgently. This article discusses six lessons drawn from the COVID-19 pandemic that can inform and facilitate greater future engagement in the global climate crisis. These lessons were identified through monitoring and analyzing media coverage of COVID-19 related events during the initial onset of COVID-19 in late January 2020 to June 30, 2020. The key lessons included the potentiality of reducing fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse emissions, the significance of responding late, a case for strong sustainability, the limits of rugged individualism, a (mis)trust in science, and the possibility of large-scale change. The insights put forward point to the fact that, like the COVID-19 pandemic, people need to continue to attach their health to expectations of government action in the context of the global climate crisis.

Indexed as

Climate changeClimate crisisCOVID-19Future climate actionsLessons

Identifiers

PMID33223626
PMCPMC7670902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.