Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3322355›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of experimental pathology1987

Stress induced periosteal changes.

S A Feik, E Storey, G Ellender

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of experimental pathology, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S A FeikDepartment of Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
E Storey
G Ellender
University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tails of Sprague-Dawley rats of approximately 50 g body mass were either left straight or bent to form a loop containing three or five vertebrae (CV). Subsequent treatment was as follows: (a) in situ: segments were removed at 0, 8, 16, 24 h, 3, 5 and 7 days and examined histologically: (b) transplants: skinned segments were transplanted autologously and examined at the same time intervals; (c) normal saline: skinned segments were placed in a 0.9% solution maintained at (i) 4 degrees C and (ii) 37 degrees C and examined 8, 16 and 24 h later. The results show that on bending a bone in situ the remodelling which occurs reflects the displacement of the soft tissues, and more specifically the periosteum, towards or away from the bone surface. Functionally the developing periosteum consists of three zones and when stressed its fibroelastic component moves away from or towards the osteogenic layer either applying tension to it stimulating bone formation, or pressure eventually inducing bone resorption. These changes are mediated via the mid-zone. The effects on the fibroelastic component alone are best seen in transplants or in normal saline at 37 degrees C where the osteogenic layer dies. The periosteum in growing bones is ideally structured to respond rapidly and sensitively to altered strain by initiating adaptive surface remodelling of bone.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalAnimalsBone TransplantationCold TemperatureIn Vitro TechniquesOsteogenesisPeriosteumRatsRats, Inbred StrainsTailTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID3322355
PMCPMC2013080
OpenAlexW940040846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.