Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33223502›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

The availability of global guidance for the promotion of women's, newborns', children's and adolescents' health and nutrition in conflicts.

Samira Aboubaker, Egmond Samir Evers, Loulou Kobeissi, Lauren Francis, Robinah Najjemba, Nathan P Miller, Steve Wall, Daniel Martinez, Joseph Vargas, Per Ashorn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samira AboubakerIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.
Egmond Samir EversDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Loulou KobeissiDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lauren FrancisDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Robinah NajjembaIndependent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nathan P MillerHealth Section, UNICEF, New York, New York, USA.
Steve WallSaving Newborn Lives, Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel MartinezMedical Department, MSF, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joseph VargasUNHCR, Geneva, Switzerland.
Per AshornFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland per.ashorn@tuni.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-2593
members of the BRANCH steering committee
BRANCH steering committee

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant global gains in sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition (SRMNCAH&N) will be difficult unless conflict settings are adequately addressed. We aimed to determine the amount, scope and quality of publically available guidance documents, to characterise the process by which agencies develop their guidance and to identify gaps in guidance on SRMNCAH&N promotion in conflicts.

methodsWe identified guidance documents published between 2008 and 2018 through English-language Internet sites of humanitarian response organisations, reviewed them for their scope and assessed their quality with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation II) tool. Additionally, we interviewed 22 key informants on guidance development, dissemination processes, perceived guidance gaps and applicability.

findingsWe identified 105 conflict-relevant guidance documents from 75 organisations. Of these, nine were specific to conflicts, others were applicable also to other humanitarian settings. Fifteen documents were technical normative guidelines, others were operational guides (67), descriptive documents (21) or advice on legal, human rights or ethics questions (2). Nutrition was the most addressed health topic, followed by communicable diseases and violence. The documents rated high quality in their 'scope and purpose' and 'clarity of presentation' and low for 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. Key informants reported end user need as the primary driver for guideline development and WHO technical guidelines as their main evidence base. Insufficient local contextualisation, lack of inter-agency coordination and lack of systematic implementation were considered problems in guideline development. Several guidance gaps were noted, including abortion care, newborn care, early child development, mental health, adolescent health beyond sexual and reproductive health and non-communicable diseases.

interpretationOrganisations are motivated and actively producing guidance for SRMNCAH&N promotion in humanitarian settings, but few documents address conflicts specifically and there are important guidance gaps. Improved inter-organisation collaboration for guidance on SRMNCAH&N promotion in conflicts and other humanitarian settings is needed.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthArmed ConflictsFood SecurityGuidelines as TopicHuman RightsReproductive HealthWomen's HealthAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancychild healthhealth policymaternal healthnutritionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID33223502
PMCPMC7684670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.