Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33223363›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2021

Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Modality Among Newly Age-Eligible Medicaid Enrollees.

Cynthia M Mojica, Bonnie Lind, Yifan Gu, Gloria D Coronado, Melinda M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cynthia M MojicaCollege of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. Electronic address: cynthia.mojica@oregonstate.edu.
Bonnie LindCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Yifan GuCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.
Melinda M DavisDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; 5Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Using Context to Improve Implementation of Evidenced-based Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Primary Care (Precise CRC)K07CA211971 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2017 to 2020
$683k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study examines individual- and practice-level predictors of screening modality among 1,484 Medicaid enrollees who initiated colorectal cancer screening (fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood tests or colonoscopy) within a year of turning age 50 years. Understanding screening modality patterns for patients and health systems can help optimize colorectal cancer screening initiatives that will lead to high screening completion rates.

methodsMultivariable logistic regression was conducted in 2019 to analyze Medicaid claims data (January 2013-June 2015) to explore predictors of colonoscopy screening (versus fecal testing).

resultsOverall, 64% of enrollees received a colonoscopy and 36% received a fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Male (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.08, 1.37) compared with female enrollees and those with 4-6 (OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.15, 2.15), 7-10 (OR=2.23, 95% CI=1.64, 3.03), and ≥11 (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.22, 2.65) primary care visits compared with 0-3 visits had higher odds of colonoscopy screening. Non-White, non-Hispanic enrollees (OR=0.71, 95% CI=0.58, 0.87) compared with White, non-Hispanics Whites had lower odds of colonoscopy screening. Practices with an endoscopy facility within their ZIP code (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.08, 2.08) compared with practices without a nearby endoscopy facility had higher odds of colonoscopy screening.

conclusionsAmong newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees who received colorectal cancer screening, non-White, non-Hispanic individuals were less likely and male enrollees and those with ≥4 primary care visits were more likely to undergo colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical test/fecal occult blood test. Colonoscopy also was the more common modality among adults whose primary care clinic had an endoscopy facility in the same ZIP code. Future research is needed to fully understand patient, provider, and practice preferences regarding screening modality.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMedicaidColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33223363
PMCPMC8493888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.