Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33222924›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia2020

Inter-facility transfer of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and GCS 14-15: The pilot study of a screening protocol by neurosurgeon to avoid unnecessary transfers.

Nima Alan, Song Kim, Nitin Agarwal, Jamie Clarke, Donald M Yealy, Aaron A Cohen-Gadol, Raymond F Sekula

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06136078 (Appropriateness of MHS Inter-facility Transfers of Traumatic Intracranial Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Spontaneous Bleeds for Level-1 Advanced Surgical Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06136078 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Appropriateness of MHS Inter-facility Transfers of Traumatic Intracranial Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Spontaneous Bleeds for Level-1 Advanced Surgical Intervention

TypeobservationalSponsorMethodist Health SystemRan2022 to 2024Enrolled250ConditionsTraumatic Intracranial Subarachnoid HemorrhageArmsrate of appropriate and inappropriate transfers from Methodist interfacility transfers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adoption of brain injury guidelines in mild traumatic brain injury: challenges at both referring and receiving trauma centers.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nima AlanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: alann@upmc.edu.
Song KimUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Nitin AgarwalUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Jamie ClarkeUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Donald M YealyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Aaron A Cohen-GadolIndiana University, Department of Neurological Surgery, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Raymond F SekulaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to evaluate feasibility and cost-reduction potential of a pilot screening program involving neurosurgeon tele-consultation for inter-facility transfer decisions in TBI patients with GCS 14-15 and abnormal CT head at a community hospital. The authors performed a retrospective comparative analysis of two patient cohorts during the pilot at a large hospital system from 2015 to 2017. In "screened" patients (n = 85), images and examination were reviewed remotely by a neurosurgeon who made recommendations regarding transfer to a level 1 trauma center. In the "unscreened" group (n = 39), all patients were transferred. Baseline patient characteristics, outcomes, and costs were reviewed. Patient demographics were similar between cohorts. Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage was more common in screened patients (29.4% vs 12.8%, P = 0.02). The presence of midline shift >5 mm was comparable between groups. Among screened patients, 5 were transferred (5.8%) and one required evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma. In unscreened patients, 7 required evacuation of subdural hematoma. None of the screened patients who were not transferred deteriorated. Screened patients had significantly reduced average total cost compared to unscreened patients ($2,003 vs. $4,482, P = 0.03) despite similar lengths of stay (2.6 vs. 2.7 days, P = 0.85). In non-surgical patients, costs were less in the screened group ($2,025 vs. $2,939), although statistically insignificant (P = 0.38). In this pilot study, remote review of images and examination by a neurosurgeon was feasible to avoid unnecessary transfer of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and GCS 14-15. The true potential in cost-reduction will be realized in system-wide large-scale implementation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHospitals, CommunityHumansIntracranial Hemorrhage, TraumaticMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeurosurgeonsPatient TransferPilot ProjectsReferral and ConsultationHead traumaNeurosurgeryTBITelemedicineTransfer

Identifiers

PMID33222924
PMCPMC7560640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.