ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2021
Split-bolus injection protocol with optimized timings of contrast medium injection and CT scanning for 3D CT angio-venography before laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Necessity of whole-body CT in patients with acute ischemic stroke and proposal for a simple brain perfusion imaging and whole-body CT protocol using split-bolus injection.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Influence of standardized breath-holding instruction and practice on craniocaudal misregistration between the arterial and venous phases in preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo propose an optimization method of contrast medium injection for the split-bolus protocol based on the contrast medium pharmacokinetics and investigate the utility of the optimized split-bolus protocol in 3D CT angio-venography for laparoscopic gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA pharmacokinetic relationship between injection duration and time to the peak enhancement was taken into account in the protocol design. The first 20 consecutive patients underwent a multi-phase scan with a single-bolus injection (single-bolus protocol), and the next 20 underwent the proposed split-bolus protocol. CT attenuations of the arteries and veins and dose-length products (DLPs) were compared between the two protocols. Two radiologists visually assessed arterial and venous depictions and the misregistrations.
resultsMean arterial CT attenuations were not significantly different between the two protocols. Though mean venous CT attenuations for the split-bolus protocol were 7-11% lower than those of the single-bolus protocol, they were visually evaluated as similar. The mean DLP of the split-bolus protocol was 46% lower than that of the single-bolus protocol. Misregistration between the arteries and veins occurred 35-80% during the single-bolus protocol, but was not indicated in the split-bolus protocol.
conclusionThe split-bolus protocol with optimized timing was more effective for providing improved image quality with reduced radiation dose compared with the single-bolus protocol in 3D CT angio-venography for laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.