Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33222021›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2020

Patient-Friendly, Olfactory-Targeted, Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Cerebral Degenerative Disorders Ensured > 400% Brain Targeting Efficiency in Rats.

Noha Nafee, Abd El Rahman Ameen, Osama Y Abdallah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Noha NafeeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. n.nafe3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-8100
Abd El Rahman AmeenResearch and Development Department, Pharo Pharma Company, Alexandria, Egypt.
Osama Y AbdallahDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EGKuwait University · KWPharos University in Alexandria · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive brain therapy for chronic neurological disorders is in high demand. Vinpocetine (VIN) tablets for cerebrovascular degenerative disorders ensued < 7% oral bioavailability. The olfactory pathway (providing direct brain access) can improve VIN pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile. In this context, VIN hydrogels based on temperature-, pH-, and ion-triggered gelation in physiological milieu were formulated. Poloxamer-chitosan (PLX-CS) and carbopol-HPMC-alginate (CP-HPMC-SA) systems were optimized for appropriate gelation time, temperature, and pH. PLX-CS-hydrogels exhibited strong mucoadhesion for > 8 h, while CP-HPMC-SA hydrogels were mucoadhesive in simulated nasal fluid, owing to pH and ion-activated gelation. Along with prolonged mucosal residence, hydrogels confirmed sustained VIN release (> 24 h), especially from CP-HPMC-SA hydrogels. As proof of concept, brain exposure of intranasal VIN hydrogels was investigated in rats versus VIN-IV bolus. PLX-CS provided 146% increase in AUC

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsHydrogelsAdministration, IntranasalAlginatesAnimalsBrainBrain DiseasesChitosanHypromellose DerivativesMaleRatsTemperatureVinca AlkaloidsAlginatesChitosanHydrogelsHypromellose DerivativesVinca Alkaloidsvinpocetinechitosanin situ gellingnasal deliverynose-to-brainsmart hydrogelsvinpocetine

Identifiers

PMID33222021
OpenAlexW3110587546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.