Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33222018›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2020

Effects of Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak on Bush Meat Enterprise and Environmental Health Risk Behavior Among Households in South-East Nigeria.

NwaJesus Anthony Onyekuru, Chukwuma Otum Ume, Chizoba Perpetua Ezea, Nice Nneoma Chukwuma Ume

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Regional dynamics of zoonotic risk perception and wildlife use in Ghana.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. On Target: Environmental Health Messaging That Hits the Mark.Environmental health perspectives · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

NwaJesus Anthony OnyekuruResource and Environmental Policy Research Centre, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Chukwuma Otum UmeInstitute for Agricultural Policy and Market Research, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany. chukwuma.ume@agrar.uni-giessen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2033-0560
Chizoba Perpetua EzeaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nice Nneoma Chukwuma UmeTransition management, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity of Nigeria · NGUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2014 disease outbreak in West Africa of the Ebola virus was the longest, largest, deadliest, and most complex epidemic of its kind in history. It was believed to have originated from bushmeat consumption and exhibited sustained human-to-human transmission. We assessed the effects of the virus outbreak in West Africa on bushmeat enterprise and environmental health risk behaviors among households in Nigeria. We adopted a multistage sampling technique to select 100 respondents. We structured two sets of questionnaires for both bushmeat sellers and consumers. The questionnaire contained information about the respondent's socioeconomic characteristics; perceived causes of the Ebola outbreak; risk behaviors; level of sales; and consumption before, during, and after the Ebola outbreak. We found a significant decrease in the levels of sales and consumption of bushmeat during the outbreak. Consumers perceived touching an infected person, but not eating bushmeat, as a significant mode of Ebola transmission. Although respondents knew about some practices that help to prevent Ebola, they did not practice these to a reasonable extent. We also found that females were 25% more likely than males to consume bushmeat during the outbreak. Given these findings, we recommend that the government should sensitize people and educate them on risk prevention behaviors they should adopt to prevent the transmission of the Ebola disease.

Indexed as

CommerceDisease OutbreaksFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMaleMeatNigeriaRisk-TakingSurveys and QuestionnairesBushmeatDisease outbreakEbolaEnvironmental hygieneHealth risk

Identifiers

PMID33222018
PMCPMC7680257
OpenAlexW3109157413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.