Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221977›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

A Three-Dimensional Bioabsorbable Tissue Marker for Volume Replacement and Radiation Planning: A Multicenter Study of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes for 818 Patients with Breast Cancer.

Cary S Kaufman, Michael J Cross, Julie L Barone, Nayana S Dekhne, Kiran Devisetty, Joshua T Dilworth, David A Edmonson, Firas G Eladoumikdachi, Jennifer S Gass, William H Hall and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cary S KaufmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. breastcare@aol.com.
Michael J CrossBreast Treatment Associates, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Julie L BaroneSaint Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.
Nayana S DekhneBeaumont Hospitals, Southfield, MI, USA.
Kiran DevisettyKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Joshua T DilworthWilliam Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
David A EdmonsonWomens Oncology, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Firas G EladoumikdachiKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jennifer S GassWomen and Infants Hospital, Breast Health Center, Providence, RI, USA.
William H HallRadiation Oncology, PeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center, Bellingham, WA, USA.
Robert L HongVirginia Hospital Center, Arlington Health System, Arlington, VA, USA.
Robert R KuskeArizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Brandon J PattonSaint Joseph Hospital, Denver, CO, USA.
Carol Perelson, New York, NY, USA.
Rogsbert F PhillipsMetro Surgical Associates, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Arnold B SmithHighlands Oncology Group, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Linda A SmithComprehensive Breast Care, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Lorraine TafraAnne Arundel Medical Center, The Breast Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Gail S LebovicSchool of Oncoplastic Surgery, Reno, NV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) ensures appropriate radiation to the tumor bed while minimizing normal tissue exposure. The BioZorb

methodsAfter informed consent, 818 patients (826 breasts) implanted with the BioZorb

resultsThe median follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 0.2-53.4 months). The 30-day breast infection rate was 0.5 % of the patients (n = 4), and re-excision was performed for 8.1 % of the patients (n = 66), whereas 2.6 % of the patients (n = 21) underwent mastectomy. Two patients (0.2 %) had local recurrence. The patient-reported cosmetic outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months were rated as good-to-excellent by 92.4 %, 90.6 %, and 87.3 % of the patients, respectively and similarly by the surgeons. The radiation oncologists reported planning of target volume (PTV) reduction for 46.2 % of the patients receiving radiation boost, with PTV reduction most commonly estimated at 30 %.

conclusionsThis report describes the first large multicenter study of 818 patients implanted with the BioZorb

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAbsorbable ImplantsHumansMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient Reported Outcome Measures

Identifiers

PMID33221977
PMCPMC8043870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.