Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221957›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Structured manual for MRI assessment of deep infiltrating endometriosis using the ENZIAN classification.

Laurin Burla, David Scheiner, Andreas M Hötker, Andreas Meier, Daniel Fink, Andreas Boss, Patrick Imesch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Can New ENZIAN Score 2020 Represent a Staging System Improving MRI Structured Report?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurin BurlaDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. laurinburla@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-3272
David ScheinerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas M HötkerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas MeierInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel FinkDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas Boss *Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patrick Imesch *Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProposal of a systematic approach to assess Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) through pelvic Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the Enzian classification and examination of inter-rater agreement.

methodsThree radiologists reviewed 23 MRI of patients with pelvic DIE at one tertiary referral center retrospectively and independently. Inclusion criteria were intraoperative confirmation of DIE and MR imaging according to ESUR (European Society of Urogenital Radiology) guidelines. Assessment of the anatomical pelvic compartments was performed using a manual based on the Enzian classification with step-by-step instructions using recommended planes and sequences presented here. Interrater agreement was measured using kappa statistics.

resultsAccording to the intraoperative site lesions in 53 anatomical compartments were present. Interrater agreement was best for compartments A (0.255) and FB (0.642). For FI (0.204) and B (0.146) it was slight, there was poor agreement for C (- 0.263), FA (- 0.022), and FO (- 0.030), respectively, and as for FU, no ureter infiltration was described.

conclusionMRI as a noninvasive diagnostic tool offers essential advantages regarding classification and therapy planning for patients with DIE. However, its assessment is difficult and a more systematic approach is needed. Our proposed manual based on the Enzian classification is reproducible and could support radiologists and gynecologists.

Indexed as

AdultEndometriosisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedObserver VariationPelvisRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDeep infiltrating endometriosisEndometriosisEnzian classificationInterobserver agreement MRI endometriosisInterrater agreement MRI endometriosisMRI assessment of deep infiltrating endometriosis

Identifiers

PMID33221957
OpenAlexW3108705213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.