Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221955›Full record

Trial reportEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2021

Efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg for the initial treatment in patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized pilot study.

Hideharu Okanobu, Tomohiko Kohno, Ritsuo Mouri, Yoshiki Hatsushika, Yumiko Yamashita, Eisuke Miyaki, Takayuki Fukuhara, Akihito Okazaki, Ayaka Sakano, Ayako Urabe and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hideharu OkanobuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan. okanobu@hiroshima-med.jrc.or.jp.
Tomohiko KohnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Ritsuo MouriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Yoshiki HatsushikaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Yumiko YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Eisuke MiyakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Takayuki FukuharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Akihito OkazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Ayaka SakanoDepartment of Medical Checkup Center, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Ayako UrabeDepartment of Medical Checkup Center, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Shintaro TakakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Nami MoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Keiji TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Hidenori OchiDepartment of Medical Checkup Center, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
Yoshinari FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to investigate the efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg in patients with erosive esophagitis.

methodSeventy-three patients with erosive esophagitis were randomly divided into two groups either vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 37) or 10 mg (n = 36). They were administered each dose for 4 weeks as the initial treatment followed by maintenance treatment with 10 mg for 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were mucosal healing rate and symptom relief at 4 weeks. The secondary endpoint was symptom relief at 12 weeks after the maintenance treatment. Mucosal healing was assessed endoscopically, and symptom relief was assessed using the FSSG score.

resultsAt 4 weeks, the endoscopic healing rates of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were 94.6% and 94.4%, respectively. The FSSG scores of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were significantly decreased in both treatment groups from 13 (4-39) to 4 (0-25) and 14 (4-40) to 3 (0-29), respectively. At 12 weeks, the scores further decreased to 2 (0-13) and 2 (0-26), respectively. The vonoprazan 10 mg group showed a similar therapeutic effect to the 20 mg group in mucosal healing at 4 weeks and in symptom relief throughout the study period. When stratified by esophagitis grading, these findings were still demonstrated in grade A/B patients but not in grade C/D patients.

conclusionOur findings suggest that initial treatment with vonoprazan 10 mg might be useful especially in patients with mild erosive esophagitis. Large controlled studies are warranted to confirm our investigation.

Indexed as

EsophagitisProton Pump InhibitorsHumansPilot ProjectsPyrrolesSulfonamidesTreatment Outcome1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanamineProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesEndoscopic mucosal healingFSSGGERDSymptom reliefVonoprazan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.