Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221934›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

Large variation in management of talar osteochondral lesions among foot and ankle surgeons: results from an international survey.

Matteo Guelfi, Christopher W DiGiovanni, James Calder, Francesc Malagelada, Guillaume Cordier, Masato Takao, Jorge Batista, Caio Nery, Marino Delmi, Miki Dalmau-Pastor and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Matteo GuelfiFoot and Ankle Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro, Genoa, Italy. matteogue@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-4648
Christopher W DiGiovanniDivision of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
James CalderFortius Clinic and Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK.
Francesc MalageladaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Guillaume CordierOrthopaedic Department, Mérignac Sports Clinic, Mérignac, France.
Masato TakaoClinical and Research Institute for Foot and Ankle Surgery, Jujo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Jorge BatistaSports Medicine Department Club Atletico Boca Juniors, Buenos Aires and Arthroscopic Center Jorge Batista SA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0910-4140
Caio NeryFederal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9286-1750
Marino DelmiClinique Des Grangettes, Chêne-Bougeries, Geneva, Switzerland.
Miki Dalmau-PastorHuman Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-698X
Giovanni CarcuroClínica Universidad de Los Andes, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1993-6250
Gabriel KhazenFoot and Ankle Department, Hospital de Clínicas Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-3951
Jordi VegaHuman Anatomy and Embryology Unit, Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society · USBarts Health NHS Trust · GBClinique du Sport · FRFortius Clinic · GBHarvard University · USHirslanden Clinique des Grangettes · CHHospital Clínico Universitario de Caracas · VEInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria · ARUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CLUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESWeil Foot & Ankle Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgeons management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) may be different to the published guidelines because not all treatment recommendations are feasible in every country. This study aimed to assess how OLT are managed worldwide by foot and ankle surgeons.

methodsA web-based survey was distributed to the members of 21 local and international scientific societies focused on foot and ankle or sports medicine surgery. Answers with a prevalence greater than 75% of respondents were considered a "main tendency", whereas where prevalence exceeded 50% of respondents they were considered a "tendency".

resultsA total of 1804 surgeons from 79 different countries returned the survey. The responses to 19 of 28 questions (68%) regarding management and treatment of OLT achieved a main tendency (> 75%) or a tendency (> 50%). Symptoms reported to be most suspicious for OLT were pain on weight-bearing (WB) and after activity (83%), deep localization of the pain (62%), and any history of trauma (55%). 89% of surgeons routinely obtain an MRI, 72% routinely get WB radiographs, and 50% perform a CT scan. When treated surgically, OLTs are managed in isolation by only 7% of surgeons, and combined with ligament repair or reconstruction by 79%; 67% report simultaneous excision of soft-tissue or bony impingements (64%). For lesions less than 10-15 mm in diameter, bone marrow stimulation (BMS) represents the first choice of treatment for 78% of surgeons (main tendency). No other treatment was recorded as a tendency. For lesions greater than 15 mm in diameter no tendencies were recorded. The BMS represented the most preferred treatment being the first choice of treatment for 41% of surgeons. OLT depth had little influence on treatment choice: 71% of surgeons treating small lesions and 69% treating large lesions would choose the same treatment regardless of whether the lesion had a depth lesser or greater than 5 mm.

conclusionThe management of OLT by foot and ankle surgeons from around the world remains extremely varied. The main clinical relevance of this study is that it provides updated information with regard to the management of OLT internationally, which could be used by surgeons worldwide in their decision-making and to inform the patient about available surgical options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAnkleAnkle InjuriesArthroplasty, SubchondralBone MarrowCartilage, ArticularFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrthopedic SurgeonsPainRadiographyTalusAnkleCartilageOLTOsteochondral lesions of the talusSurvey

Identifiers

PMID33221934
OpenAlexW3107185040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.