Congenital heart defects as an intrinsic additional risk factor for the occurrence and outcome of myocardial infarction.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Decreased lipid levels in adult with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023
   Pooled it
2. Coronary artery disease in adults with congenital heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2023
   Review
3. A novelExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Long-term outcomes after myocardial infarction in middle-aged and older patients with congenital heart disease-a nationwide study.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as