Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221835›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2021

Optimizing treatment cascades for mental healthcare in Mozambique: preliminary effectiveness of the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for Mental Health (SAIA-MH).

Katrin E Fabian, Alberto Muanido, Vasco F J Cumbe, Nelia Manaca, Leecreesha Hicks, Bryan J Weiner, Kenneth Sherr, Bradley H Wagenaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katrin E FabianDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alberto MuanidoHealth Alliance International, Beira, Mozambique.
Vasco F J CumbeSofala Provincial Health Directorate, Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Beira, Mozambique.
Nelia ManacaHealth Alliance International, Beira, Mozambique.
Leecreesha HicksHealth Alliance International, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kenneth SherrDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bradley H WagenaarDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Strengthening the identification and treatment of depression in primary care in MozambiqueK01MH110599 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGENAAR, BRADLEY · 2017 to 2020
$633k
Systems analysis and improvement approach to optimize task-shifted mental health diagnosis and treatment cascades (SAIA-MH)R21MH113691 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WAGENAAR, BRADLEY · 2017 to 2018
$395k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH110599NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH113691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial investments are being made to scale-up access to mental healthcare in low- and middle-income countries, but less attention has been paid to quality and performance of nascent public-sector mental healthcare systems. This study tested the initial effectiveness of an implementation strategy to optimize routine outpatient mental healthcare cascade performance in Mozambique [the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach for Mental Health (SAIA-MH)]. This study employed a pre-post design from September 2018 to August 2019 across four Ministry of Health clinics among 810 patients and 3234 outpatient mental health visits. Effectiveness outcomes evaluated progression through the care cascade, including: (1) initial diagnosis and medication selection; (2) enrolling in follow-up care; (3) returning after initial consultation within 60 days; (4) returning for follow-up visits on time; (5) returning for follow-up visits adherent to medication and (6) achieving function improvement. Clustered generalized linear models evaluated odds of completing cascade steps pre- vs post-intervention. Facilities prioritized improvements focused on the follow-up cascade, with 62.5% (10 of 16) monthly system modifications targeting medication adherence. At baseline, only 4.2% of patient visits achieved function improvement; during the 6 months of SAIA-MH implementation, this improved to 13.1% of patient visits. Multilevel logistic regression found increased odds of returning on time and adherent [aOR = 1.53, 95% CI (1.21, 1.94), P = 0.0004] and returning on time, adherent and with function improvement [aOR = 3.68, 95% CI (2.57, 5.44), P < 0.0001] after SAIA-MH implementation. No significant differences were observed regarding other cascade steps. The SAIA-MH implementation strategy shows promise for rapidly and significantly improving mental healthcare cascade outcomes, including the ultimate goal of patient function improvement. Given poor baseline mental healthcare cascade performance, there is an urgent need for evidence-based implementation strategies to optimize the performance of mental healthcare cascades in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareHumansMozambiqueSystems Analysiscare cascadesGlobal mental healthimplementation scienceimplementation strategyMozambiqueprimary mental healthcarequality improvementSystems Analysis and Improvement (SAIA)task-shifting

Identifiers

PMID33221835
PMCPMC8600015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.