ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022
Principal curve approaches for inferring 3D chromatin architecture.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements and future directions in single-cell Hi-C based 3D chromatin modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- STATISTICAL CURVE MODELS FOR INFERRING 3D CHROMATIN ARCHITECTURE.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Assessing chromatin relocalization in 3D using the patient rule induction method.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction?BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Can 3D diploid genome reconstruction from unphased Hi-C data be salvaged?NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) genome spatial organization is critical for numerous cellular processes, including transcription, while certain conformation-driven structural alterations are frequently oncogenic. Genome architecture had been notoriously difficult to elucidate, but the advent of the suite of chromatin conformation capture assays, notably Hi-C, has transformed understanding of chromatin structure and provided downstream biological insights. Although many findings have flowed from direct analysis of the pairwise proximity data produced by these assays, there is added value in generating corresponding 3D reconstructions deriving from superposing genomic features on the reconstruction. Accordingly, many methods for inferring 3D architecture from proximity data have been advanced. However, none of these approaches exploit the fact that single chromosome solutions constitute a one-dimensional (1D) curve in 3D. Rather, this aspect has either been addressed by imposition of constraints, which is both computationally burdensome and cell type specific, or ignored with contiguity imposed after the fact. Here, we target finding a 1D curve by extending principal curve methodology to the metric scaling problem. We illustrate how this approach yields a sequence of candidate solutions, indexed by an underlying smoothness or degrees-of-freedom parameter, and propose methods for selection from this sequence. We apply the methodology to Hi-C data obtained on IMR90 cells and so are positioned to evaluate reconstruction accuracy by referencing orthogonal imaging data. The results indicate the utility and reproducibility of our principal curve approach in the face of underlying structural variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.