Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221831›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022

Principal curve approaches for inferring 3D chromatin architecture.

Elena Tuzhilina, Trevor J Hastie, Mark R Segal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancements and future directions in single-cell Hi-C based 3D chromatin modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena TuzhilinaDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Trevor J HastieDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Mark R SegalDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Funding

New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01EB001988 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSTONE, IAIN M · 2003 to 2018
$6.1M
New Statistical Methods for Medical Signals and ImagesR01GM134483 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Iain M Johnstone · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
Reconstruction of 3D Genome Architecture from Chromatin Conformation Capture DataR01GM109457 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SEGAL, MARK R · 2013 to 2020
$2.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001988NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) genome spatial organization is critical for numerous cellular processes, including transcription, while certain conformation-driven structural alterations are frequently oncogenic. Genome architecture had been notoriously difficult to elucidate, but the advent of the suite of chromatin conformation capture assays, notably Hi-C, has transformed understanding of chromatin structure and provided downstream biological insights. Although many findings have flowed from direct analysis of the pairwise proximity data produced by these assays, there is added value in generating corresponding 3D reconstructions deriving from superposing genomic features on the reconstruction. Accordingly, many methods for inferring 3D architecture from proximity data have been advanced. However, none of these approaches exploit the fact that single chromosome solutions constitute a one-dimensional (1D) curve in 3D. Rather, this aspect has either been addressed by imposition of constraints, which is both computationally burdensome and cell type specific, or ignored with contiguity imposed after the fact. Here, we target finding a 1D curve by extending principal curve methodology to the metric scaling problem. We illustrate how this approach yields a sequence of candidate solutions, indexed by an underlying smoothness or degrees-of-freedom parameter, and propose methods for selection from this sequence. We apply the methodology to Hi-C data obtained on IMR90 cells and so are positioned to evaluate reconstruction accuracy by referencing orthogonal imaging data. The results indicate the utility and reproducibility of our principal curve approach in the face of underlying structural variation.

Indexed as

ChromatinGenomeChromosomesGenomicsHumansReproducibility of ResultsChromatin3D structureGenome reconstructionHi-C assayMetric scalingMultiplex FISH

Identifiers

PMID33221831
PMCPMC9037393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.