ArticleOphthalmic research2021
Analysis of YAG Laser-Induced Damage in Intraocular Lenses: Characterization of Optical and Surface Properties of YAG Shots.
Article in Ophthalmic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical Quality Degradation Following Nd:YAG Laser-Induced Intraocular Lens Pitting: A Multimodal Experimental Study.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nd:YAG capsulotomy: an update.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Review
- Assessing Particle Release from Intraocular Lenses with a Combination of OptoFluidic Force Induction, μ-Raman and μ-FTIR.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Incorrectly Focused Neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser Beam Leads to Massive Destructive Effects in Small-Aperture (Pinhole) Intraocular Lenses.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser treatment in ophthalmology: a review of the most common procedures Capsulotomy and Iridotomy.Lasers in medical science · 2024Review
- Precise Posterior Nd:YAG Capsulotomy without Creating Defects is Key for Patients' Quality of Vision.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Micro-Computed Tomography (µCT) as a Tool for High-Resolution 3D Imaging and Analysis of Intraocular Lenses: Feasibility and Proof of the Methodology to Evaluate YAG Pits.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Evaluating impact of Nd: YAG laser associated defects on optical quality of hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses using visualization of light propagation and USAF test targets.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess differences in neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG)-induced defects in hydrophilic and hydrophobic intraocular lenses (IOLs) and describe optical and surface properties of YAG shots/pitting. Describing and measuring the iatrogenic produced defects should achieve higher awareness on this topic and change the mindset of such a trivial procedure to be proceeded with more caution and calmness in the future. MATERIALS: Twelve IOLs from different manufacturers made of hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials were evaluated before and after treatment with the Nd:YAG laser. Microscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopic (ESEM) images were used to visually analyze the defects. Additionally, wavefront measurements were taken for power mapping and Raman spectroscopy was performed. Vertical and horizontal dimensions of the defects were analyzed and compared, and Raman line scans assessed the changes in the chemical structure in the defect area of the IOL.
resultsMicroscopically, pitting of the surface could be observed in both lens types. Defects in hydrophobic lenses appeared bigger and were visible with less magnification than in hydrophilic lenses. Similar results were obtained with ESEM images where the defects in hydrophobic IOLs seemed to be frayed while defects in hydrophilic IOLs were of circular shape. Raman spectroscopy revealed deeper defects in hydrophobic lenses. Vertical dimensions of the defects were statistically significant (p = 0.036) and greater in hydrophobic materials while horizontal dimensions did not reach significance (p = 0.056). The area of chemical changes was greater than the visible defect area and smaller in hydrophilic than that in hydrophobic materials.
conclusionNd:YAG seems to have greater impact on hydrophobic IOL materials as that damage was greater and more frayed than that in hydrophilic materials. Moreover, there seems to be larger, distinctive damage area in IOLs (with chemical changes in the material) than that is visually recognizable. Therefore, a very cautious approach is recommended when performing capsulotomy, as defects in the surface structure can occur. This might come along with problems in quality of vision in monofocal and primarily premium IOLs (multifocal, enhanced depth of focus, and toric IOLs), dependent on the size, dimension, and position in the IOL. YAG capsulotomy should not be considered trivial but should be carried out with precision and without time pressure, just like surgery itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.