Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221705›Full record

Trial reportPregnancy hypertension2021

Placental growth factor measurements in the assessment of women with suspected Preeclampsia: A stratified analysis of the PARROT trial.

Kate E Duhig, Jenny E Myers, Chris Gale, Joanna C Girling, Kate Harding, Andrew Sharp, Nigel A B Simpson, Derek Tuffnell, Paul T Seed, Andrew H Shennan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pregnancy hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prediction of perinatal survival in early-onset fetal growth restriction: role of placental growth factor.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kate E DuhigDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London (KED, PTS, AHS, LCC), United Kingdom. Electronic address: Kate.duhig@kcl.ac.uk.
Jenny E MyersThe Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Jenny.myers@manchester.ac.uk.
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Christopher.gale@imperial.ac.uk.
Joanna C GirlingWest Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Joanna.girling@chelwest.nhs.uk.
Kate HardingGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Kate.harding@gstt.nhs.uk.
Andrew SharpUniversity of Liverpool and Liverpool Women's Hospital, members of Liverpool Health Partners, United Kingdom. Electronic address: A.sharp@liverpool.ac.uk.
Nigel A B SimpsonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address: n.a.b.simpson@leeds.ac.uk.
Derek TuffnellBradford Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Derek.Tuffnell@bthft.nhs.uk.
Paul T SeedDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London (KED, PTS, AHS, LCC), United Kingdom; The Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: paul.seed@kcl.ac.uk.
Andrew H ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London (KED, PTS, AHS, LCC), United Kingdom; The Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Andrew.shennan@kcl.ac.uk.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London (KED, PTS, AHS, LCC), United Kingdom; The Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Neonatal Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Campus, Imperial College London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: lucy.chappell@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBImperial College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBLiverpool Women's Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWest Middlesex University Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2014-05-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePlacental growth factor testing decreases time to recognition of preeclampsia and may reduce severe maternal adverse outcomes. This analysis aims to describe the clinical phenotype of women by PlGF concentration, and to determine the mechanism(s) underpinning the reduction in severe maternal adverse outcomes in the PARROT trial, in order to inform how PlGF testing may be optimally used within clinical management algorithms. STUDY

designThis was a planned secondary analysis from the PARROT trial that compared revealed PlGF testing and management guidance with usual care in the assessment of women with suspected preterm preeclampsia.

main outcome measuresMaternal and perinatal outcomes following stratification of women by trial group, and measured PlGF concentration.

results1006 women were included. PlGF < 100 pg/ml identified women with more marked hypertension, increased adverse maternal outcomes and preterm delivery rates, and higher rates of small for gestational age infants. There was a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes in women whose results were revealed when PlGF levels were 12-100 pg/ml compared to usual care (3.8% vs 6.9%; aOR 0.15(95% CI 0.03-0.92). There was no significant difference in gestation at delivery between concealed or revealed groups in any PlGF categories.

conclusionLow PlGF concentrations are associated with severe preeclampsia. The reduction in severe adverse maternal outcomes may be mediated through quicker diagnosis and intensive surveillance, as recommended by the management algorithm for those at increased risk. PlGF is particularly beneficial in those who test 12-100 pg/ml, as these may be women with silent multi-organ disease who otherwise may go undetected.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersFemaleGestational AgeHumansPlacenta Growth FactorPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSingle-Blind MethodBiomarkersPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorDiagnostic testingHypertension in pregnancyPlGFPreeclampsia

Identifiers

PMID33221705
PMCPMC7909322
OpenAlexW3094276310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.