Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221662›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2021

Visual and haptic responses as measures of word comprehension and speed of processing in toddlers: Relative predictive utility.

Erin Smolak, Kristi Hendrickson, Pascal Zesiger, Diane Poulin-Dubois, Margaret Friend

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Drivers of Lexical Processing and Implications for Early Learning.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Erin SmolakSan Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: erin.smolak@boystown.org.
Kristi HendricksonUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Pascal ZesigerUniversity of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Diane Poulin-DuboisConcordia University, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8, Canada.
Margaret FriendSan Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
San Diego State University · USConcordia University · CAUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

RESEARCH IN HUMAN COMMUNICATION AND ITS DISORDERST32DC000013 · NIDCD · FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS'HOME · PI Ryan W. McCreery · 1989 to 2026
$4.5M
Neurocognitive Approaches to Communication DisordersT32DC007361 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tracy Love-Geffen · 2005 to 2026
$3.9M
The Path to Language and Literacy: A Cross-Linguistic Longitudinal ApproachR01HD068458 · NICHD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIEND, MARGARET J · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068458NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000013NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC007361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early vocabulary knowledge and speed of word processing are important foundational skills for the development of preschool and school-age language and cognition. However, the variance in outcomes accounted for by parent-reported receptive or expressive vocabulary is generally modest. Recent research suggests that directly assessed, decontextualized vocabulary predicts developmental outcomes, including general language ability and kindergarten readiness, accounting for additional variance above and beyond parent-reported vocabulary. The current research extends this finding by exploring prediction from both decontextualized vocabulary and speed of word processing at 2 years of age to vocabulary during the preschool period. At age 2, children completed a two-alternative forced-choice task that yielded a measure of decontextualized vocabulary (number of correct touch responses) and two measures of speed of processing: latency to fixate the target (visual response latency) and latency to touch (haptic response latency). Results reveal that age 2 vocabulary and visual response latency, but not haptic response latency, independently predict vocabulary at ages 3 and 4. Furthermore, only decontextualized vocabulary remains a significant predictor when controlling for speed of processing, but not vice versa. This suggests that the number of early, stable word-referent associations and the efficiency with which these are processed are important to vocabulary outcomes. However, it also suggests that decontextualized vocabulary may be a more robust unique predictor of downstream outcomes.

Indexed as

ComprehensionLanguage DevelopmentChild, PreschoolHumansLanguageLanguage TestsVocabularyEarly childhood developmentLanguage developmentSpeed of word processingVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID33221662
PMCPMC7855197
OpenAlexW3105306192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.