ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2021
MhURI:A Supervised Segmentation Approach to Leverage Salient Brain Tissues in Magnetic Resonance Images.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incorporating normal periventricular changes for enhanced pathological white matter hyperintensity segmentation: on multiclass deep learning approaches.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Deep optimization-guided hybrid neural network for accurate detection and segmentation of white matter hyperintensities in clinical MRI images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Attention-enhanced SAM with PBFO tuning: advancing glioma MRI segmentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- ADU-Net: An Attention Dense U-Net based deep supervised DNN for automated lesion segmentation of COVID-19 from chest CT images.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2023Article
- Interpretable Model Based on Pyramid Scene Parsing Features for Brain Tumor MRI Image Segmentation.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesAccurate segmentation of critical tissues from a brain MRI is pivotal for characterization and quantitative pattern analysis of the human brain and thereby, identifies the earliest signs of various neurodegenerative diseases. To date, in most cases, it is done manually by the radiologists. The overwhelming workload in some of the thickly populated nations may cause exhaustion leading to interruption for the doctors, which may pose a continuing threat to patient safety. A novel fusion method called U-Net inception based on 3D convolutions and transition layers is proposed to address this issue.
methodsA 3D deep learning method called Multi headed U-Net with Residual Inception (MhURI) accompanied by Morphological Gradient channel for brain tissue segmentation is proposed, which incorporates Residual Inception 2-Residual (RI2R) module as the basic building block. The model exploits the benefits of morphological pre-processing for structural enhancement of MR images. A multi-path data encoding pipeline is introduced on top of the U-Net backbone, which encapsulates initial global features and captures the information from each MRI modality.
resultsThe proposed model has accomplished encouraging outcomes, which appreciates the adequacy in terms of some of the established quality metrices when compared with some of the state-of-the-art methods while evaluating with respect to two popular publicly available data sets.
conclusionThe model is entirely automatic and able to segment gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from brain MRI effectively with sufficient accuracy. Hence, it may be considered to be a potential computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tool for radiologists and other medical practitioners in their clinical diagnosis workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.