Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33221055›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2021

Reproducible and Interpretable Spiculation Quantification for Lung Cancer Screening.

Wookjin Choi, Saad Nadeem, Sadegh R Alam, Joseph O Deasy, Allen Tannenbaum, Wei Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. PreoperativeComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  8. CIRDataset: A large-scale Dataset for Clinically-Interpretable lung nodule Radiomics and malignancy prediction.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wookjin ChoiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA; Department of Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia State University, 1 Hayden St, Petersburg, VA 23806, USA.
Saad NadeemDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: nadeems@mskcc.org.
Sadegh R AlamDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Joseph O DeasyDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Allen TannenbaumDepartments of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11790, USA.
Wei LuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USApplied Mathematics (United States) · USVirginia State University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Glymphatic function in a transgenic rat model of Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG048769 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENVENISTE, HELENE D, NEDERGAARD, MAIKEN · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
Quantitative PET/CT Analysis to Improve Evaluation of Tumor ResponseR01CA172638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LU, WEI · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172638NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiculations are important predictors of lung cancer malignancy, which are spikes on the surface of the pulmonary nodules. In this study, we proposed an interpretable and parameter-free technique to quantify the spiculation using area distortion metric obtained by the conformal (angle-preserving) spherical parameterization. We exploit the insight that for an angle-preserved spherical mapping of a given nodule, the corresponding negative area distortion precisely characterizes the spiculations on that nodule. We introduced novel spiculation scores based on the area distortion metric and spiculation measures. We also semi-automatically segment lung nodule (for reproducibility) as well as vessel and wall attachment to differentiate the real spiculations from lobulation and attachment. A simple pathological malignancy prediction model is also introduced. We used the publicly-available LIDC-IDRI dataset pathologists (strong-label) and radiologists (weak-label) ratings to train and test radiomics models containing this feature, and then externally validate the models. We achieved AUC = 0.80 and 0.76, respectively, with the models trained on the 811 weakly-labeled LIDC datasets and tested on the 72 strongly-labeled LIDC and 73 LUNGx datasets; the previous best model for LUNGx had AUC = 0.68. The number-of-spiculations feature was found to be highly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ=0.44) with the radiologists' spiculation score. We developed a reproducible and interpretable, parameter-free technique for quantifying spiculations on nodules. The spiculation quantification measures was then applied to the radiomics framework for pathological malignancy prediction with reproducible semi-automatic segmentation of nodule. Using our interpretable features (size, attachment, spiculation, lobulation), we were able to achieve higher performance than previous models. In the future, we will exhaustively test our model for lung cancer screening in the clinic.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSolitary Pulmonary NoduleEarly Detection of CancerHumansLungReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedConformal MappingLung Cancer ScreeningSpiculation

Identifiers

PMID33221055
PMCPMC7920914
OpenAlexW3099876044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.