Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33220589›Full record

ArticleLeukemia research2020

Expression of putative leukemia stem cell targets in genetically-defined acute myeloid leukemia subtypes.

Breann Yanagisawa, Brandy Perkins, Theodoros Karantanos, Mark Levis, Gabriel Ghiaur, B Douglas Smith, Richard J Jones

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Leukemic Stem Cells and Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Preclinical Rationale, Current Clinical Progress, and Barriers to Success.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Breann YanagisawaSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brandy PerkinsSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Theodoros KarantanosSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark LevisSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gabriel GhiaurSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
B Douglas SmithSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Richard J JonesSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: rjjones@jhmi.edu.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Targeting MRDP01CA225618 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine M. Bollard, KENNETH R COOKE · 2019 to 2026
$15.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA225618NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients achieve complete remissions, the majority still eventually relapse and die of their disease. Rare primitive leukemia cells, so-called leukemia stem cells (LSCs), represent one potential type of resistant cell subpopulation responsible for this dissociation between response and cure. Several LSC targets have been described, but there is limited evidence about their relative utility or that targeting any can prevent relapse. LSCs not only appear to be biologically heterogeneous, but the classic immunocompromised mouse transplantation model also has serious shortcomings as an LSC assay. Out data suggest that the most immature cell phenotype that can be identified within a patient's leukemia may be clinically relevant and represent the de facto LSC. Moreover, although phenotypically heterogeneous, these putative LSCs show consistent phenotypes within individual genetically defined groups. Using this LSC definition, we studied several previously described putative LSC targets, CD25, CD26, CD47, CD96, CD123, and CLL-1, and all were expressed across heterogeneous LSC phenotypes. In addition, with the exception of CD47, there was at most low expression of these targets on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). CD123 and CLL-1 demonstrated the greatest expression differences between putative LSCs and normal HSCs. Importantly, CD123 monoclonal antibodies were cytotoxic in vitro to putative LSCs from all AML subtypes, while showing limited to no toxicity against normal HSCs and hematopoietic progenitors. Since minimal residual disease appears to be a more homogeneous population of cells responsible for relapse, targeting CD123 in this setting may be most effective.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCell SeparationComplement ActivationFlow CytometryGranulocyte Precursor CellsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansImmunophenotypingIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceInterleukin-3 Receptor alpha SubunitLectins, C-TypeLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCLEC12A protein, humanIL3RA protein, humanInterleukin-3 Receptor alpha SubunitLectins, C-TypeReceptors, MitogenAMLCD123CLL-1Leukemia stem cells

Identifiers

PMID33220589
PMCPMC7969493
OpenAlexW3101809054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.