ArticleLeukemia research2020
Expression of putative leukemia stem cell targets in genetically-defined acute myeloid leukemia subtypes.
Article in Leukemia research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Highly effective combination of BRG1/BRM inhibitor with BET inhibitor or decitabine for high-risk MECOM-rearranged AML.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Preclinical efficacy of tasquinimod-based combinations in advanced myeloproliferative neoplasms in blastic phase.Blood advances · 2025Article
- CD123-targeting immunotherapeutic approaches in acute myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Unveiling the potential of CLL-1: a promising target for AML therapy.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Review
- Leukemic Stem Cells and Hematological Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Targeting of epigenetic co-dependencies enhances anti-AML efficacy of Menin inhibitor in AML with MLL1-r or mutant NPM1.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia Stem Cells: Origin, Characteristics, and Clinical Implications.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Taking the STING out of acute myeloid leukemia through macrophage-mediated phagocytosis.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Article
- Engineering CAR-NK cells to secrete IL-15 sustains their anti-AML functionality but is associated with systemic toxicities.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Preclinical Rationale, Current Clinical Progress, and Barriers to Success.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021Review
- Relapse Mechanism and Treatment Strategy After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Treating B-Cell Hematological Malignancies.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients achieve complete remissions, the majority still eventually relapse and die of their disease. Rare primitive leukemia cells, so-called leukemia stem cells (LSCs), represent one potential type of resistant cell subpopulation responsible for this dissociation between response and cure. Several LSC targets have been described, but there is limited evidence about their relative utility or that targeting any can prevent relapse. LSCs not only appear to be biologically heterogeneous, but the classic immunocompromised mouse transplantation model also has serious shortcomings as an LSC assay. Out data suggest that the most immature cell phenotype that can be identified within a patient's leukemia may be clinically relevant and represent the de facto LSC. Moreover, although phenotypically heterogeneous, these putative LSCs show consistent phenotypes within individual genetically defined groups. Using this LSC definition, we studied several previously described putative LSC targets, CD25, CD26, CD47, CD96, CD123, and CLL-1, and all were expressed across heterogeneous LSC phenotypes. In addition, with the exception of CD47, there was at most low expression of these targets on normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). CD123 and CLL-1 demonstrated the greatest expression differences between putative LSCs and normal HSCs. Importantly, CD123 monoclonal antibodies were cytotoxic in vitro to putative LSCs from all AML subtypes, while showing limited to no toxicity against normal HSCs and hematopoietic progenitors. Since minimal residual disease appears to be a more homogeneous population of cells responsible for relapse, targeting CD123 in this setting may be most effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.