ReviewChest2021
How Can I Survive This?: Coping During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
Review in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community Members' Perceptions of a Resource-Rich Well-Being Website in California During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Peer support between healthcare workers in hospital and out-of-hospital settings: a scoping review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Intensivists' Well-Being: A Qualitative Study.Chest · 2022Article
- Moral Injury and Moral Resilience in Health Care Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of palliative medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient- and Family-Centered Care and on the Mental Health of Health Care Workers, Patients, and Families.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Determination of Pharmacists' Opinions about Collegial Solidarity.Turkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2021Article
- COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS): Current knowledge on pathophysiology and ICU treatment - A narrative review.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021Review
- The changing face of medical professionalism and the impact of COVID-19.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, health-care professionals are experiencing unprecedented stress related to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Responding to a new virus for which there is no effective treatment yet and no vaccine is beyond challenging. Moral distress, which is experienced when clinicians are unable to act in the way that they believe they should, is often experienced when they are dealing with end-of-life care issues and insufficient resources. Both factors have been widespread during this pandemic, particularly when patients are dying alone and there is a lack of personal protection equipment that plagues many overburdened health-care systems. We explore here, guided by evidence, the concept and features of moral distress and individual resilience. Mitigation strategies involve individual and institutional responsibilities; the importance of solidarity, peer support, psychological first aid, and gratitude are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.