Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33220055›Full record

ArticleSleep2021

Cross-participant prediction of vigilance stages through the combined use of wPLI and wSMI EEG functional connectivity metrics.

Laura Sophie Imperatori, Jacinthe Cataldi, Monica Betta, Emiliano Ricciardi, Robin A A Ince, Francesca Siclari, Giulio Bernardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Sophie ImperatoriMoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0227-1600
Jacinthe CataldiCenter for Investigation and Research on Sleep, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monica BettaMoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Emiliano RicciardiMoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.
Robin A A InceInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8427-0507
Francesca SiclariCenter for Investigation and Research on Sleep, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-9719
Giulio BernardiMoMiLab, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-7075

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity (FC) metrics describe brain inter-regional interactions and may complement information provided by common power-based analyses. Here, we investigated whether the FC-metrics weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI) and weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI) may unveil functional differences across four stages of vigilance-wakefulness (W), NREM-N2, NREM-N3, and REM sleep-with respect to each other and to power-based features. Moreover, we explored their possible contribution in identifying differences between stages characterized by distinct levels of consciousness (REM+W vs. N2+N3) or sensory disconnection (REM vs. W). Overnight sleep and resting-state wakefulness recordings from 24 healthy participants (27 ± 6 years, 13F) were analyzed to extract power and FC-based features in six classical frequency bands. Cross-validated linear discriminant analyses (LDA) were applied to investigate the ability of extracted features to discriminate (1) the four vigilance stages, (2) W+REM vs. N2+N3, and (3) W vs. REM. For the four-way vigilance stages classification, combining features based on power and both connectivity metrics significantly increased accuracy relative to considering only power, wPLI, or wSMI features. Delta-power and connectivity (0.5-4 Hz) represented the most relevant features for all the tested classifications, in line with a possible involvement of slow waves in consciousness and sensory disconnection. Sigma-FC, but not sigma-power (12-16 Hz), was found to strongly contribute to the differentiation between states characterized by higher (W+REM) and lower (N2+N3) probabilities of conscious experiences. Finally, alpha-FC resulted as the most relevant FC-feature for distinguishing among wakefulness and REM sleep and may thus reflect the level of disconnection from the external environment.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyWakefulnessConsciousnessHumansSleepSleep StagesclassificationconsciousnessdisconnectionEEGfunctional connectivityNREMREMsleep

Identifiers

PMID33220055
PMCPMC8120343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.