ArticleSleep2021
Cross-participant prediction of vigilance stages through the combined use of wPLI and wSMI EEG functional connectivity metrics.
Article in Sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- rTMS Modulates Static and Dynamic Brain Functional Networks in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An EEG Microstate Study.Brain topography · 2026Trial
- Trial
- EEG functional connectivity measures for differentiating 6-month consciousness-related outcome after brain injury.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Effects of MRI-Navigated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Task Performance, Subjective Workload, and EEG Responses During Prolonged Simulated Flight: A Randomized Crossover Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Brain Networks to Sleep Perception: EEG-Derived Global Efficiency is Associated with Subjective Sleep Quality in University Students.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Individual differences in brain attention networks: the challenge of indexing temporal change.Frontiers in cognition · 2025Article
- Article
- Content-state dimensions characterize different types of neuronal markers of consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2024Article
- Effects of gender and age on sleep EEG functional connectivity differences in subjects with mild difficulty falling asleep.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- TMS-EEG and resting-state EEG applied to altered states of consciousness: oscillations, complexity, and phenomenology.iScience · 2023Article
- Do we really measure what we think we are measuring?iScience · 2023Article
- Nonlinear functional muscle network based on information theory tracks sensorimotor integration post stroke.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Oscillatory activity and EEG phase synchrony of concurrent word segmentation and meaning-mapping in 9-year-old children.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Role of corpus callosum in sleep spindle synchronization and coupling with slow waves.Brain communications · 2021Article
- Consciousness and complexity: a consilience of evidence.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) metrics describe brain inter-regional interactions and may complement information provided by common power-based analyses. Here, we investigated whether the FC-metrics weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI) and weighted Symbolic Mutual Information (wSMI) may unveil functional differences across four stages of vigilance-wakefulness (W), NREM-N2, NREM-N3, and REM sleep-with respect to each other and to power-based features. Moreover, we explored their possible contribution in identifying differences between stages characterized by distinct levels of consciousness (REM+W vs. N2+N3) or sensory disconnection (REM vs. W). Overnight sleep and resting-state wakefulness recordings from 24 healthy participants (27 ± 6 years, 13F) were analyzed to extract power and FC-based features in six classical frequency bands. Cross-validated linear discriminant analyses (LDA) were applied to investigate the ability of extracted features to discriminate (1) the four vigilance stages, (2) W+REM vs. N2+N3, and (3) W vs. REM. For the four-way vigilance stages classification, combining features based on power and both connectivity metrics significantly increased accuracy relative to considering only power, wPLI, or wSMI features. Delta-power and connectivity (0.5-4 Hz) represented the most relevant features for all the tested classifications, in line with a possible involvement of slow waves in consciousness and sensory disconnection. Sigma-FC, but not sigma-power (12-16 Hz), was found to strongly contribute to the differentiation between states characterized by higher (W+REM) and lower (N2+N3) probabilities of conscious experiences. Finally, alpha-FC resulted as the most relevant FC-feature for distinguishing among wakefulness and REM sleep and may thus reflect the level of disconnection from the external environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.