Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33220000›Full record

Observational studyClinical cardiology2021

Fluoroscopy usage in contemporary interventional electrophysiology: Insights from a European registry.

Jedrzej Kosiuk, Lucas Fiedler, Sabine Ernst, David Duncker, Nikola Pavlović, Silvia Guarguagli, Clara Stegmann, Dawid Miskowiec, Rodrigue Garcia, Vincenzo Russo and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Fluoroscopy-minimization strategy for catheter ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia by wOmen OPerators: the STOOP Multicentre Registry.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ["Zero fluoro"-a chance for more women in electrophysiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2021
    Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jedrzej KosiukRhythmology Department, Helios Clinic Koethen, Koethen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-1372
Lucas FiedlerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, General Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Sabine ErnstRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
David DunckerRhythmology and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2996-6338
Nikola PavlovićDepartment of Cardiology, Univeristy Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Silvia GuarguagliRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Clara StegmannDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Dawid MiskowiecDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-9550
Rodrigue GarciaRhythmology Department, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9350-2437
Vincenzo RussoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"-Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Andriy YakushevAmosov National Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nándor SzegediHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tom De PotterCardiovascular Center, OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoroscopy has been an essential part of every electrophysiological procedure since its inception. However, till now no clear standards regarding acceptable x-ray exposure nor recommendation how to achieve them have been proposed. HYPOTHESIS: Current norms and quality markers required for optimal clinical routine can be identified.

methodsCenters participating in this Europe-wide multicenter, prospective registry were requested to provide characteristics of the center, operators, technical equipment as well as procedural settings of consecutive cases.

resultsTwenty-five centers (72% university clinics, with a mean volume of 526 ± 348 procedures yearly) from 14 European countries provided data on 1788 cases [9% diagnostic procedures (DP), 38% atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations, 44% other supraventricular (SVT) ablations, and 9% ventricular ablations (VT)] conducted by 95 operators (89% male, 41 ± 7 years old). Mean dose area product (DAP) and time was 304 ± 608 cGy*cm

conclusionExposure to ionizing radiation varies widely in daily practice for all procedure. Significant opportunities for harmonization of exposure toward the lower range has been identified.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultAtrial FibrillationCatheter AblationElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacEuropeFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleProspective StudiesSurgery, Computer-Assistedelectrophysiologyfluoroscopyradiationx-rayzero-fluoroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33220000
PMCPMC7803367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.