ArticlePediatric diabetes2021
Performance of three different continuous glucose monitoring systems in children with type 1 diabetes during a diabetes summer camp.
Article in Pediatric diabetes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring during Different Liquid Solution Challenges in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Trial
- Article
- Experience with a Self-Management Education Program for Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- The benefits and accuracy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending a summer camp.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
- Head-to-Head Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: Why are They not Used More Systematically?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Performance of real-time continuous glucose monitoring during track and field training in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2024Article
- Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring during exercise-related hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Clinical Performance Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Reporting.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes before and during a Diabetes Camp-A Ceiling Effect?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system in neonatal foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2021Article
- Performance of three different continuous glucose monitoring systems in children with type 1 diabetes during a diabetes summer camp.Pediatric diabetes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of the three most commonly used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in almost real-life situation during a diabetes camp in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) aged 9-14 years. Data was gathered during a 2-week summer camp under physicians' supervision. Out of 38 participating children with T1D (aged: 11.0 [9.9; 12.1] years; 57% girls, mean HbA1c 7.2 [6.9; 7.7] %,) 37 wore a CGM system (either Abbott FreeStyle Libre (FSL), Dexcom G6 (DEX) or Medtronic Enlite (ENL)) throughout the camp. All concomitantly available data pairs of capillary glucose measurements and sensor values were used for the analysis. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was calculated and Parkes Error Grid analyses were done for all three systems used. In total 2079 data pairs were available for analysis. The overall MARDs of CGM systems used at the camp was FSL: 13.3% (6.7;21.6). DEX: 10.3% (5.8; 16.7) and ENL 8.5% (3.6; 15.6). During eu-, hypo- and hyperglycemia MARDs were lowest in ENL. Highest MARDs were seen in hypoglycemia, where all three systems exhibited MARDs above 15%. Overnight MARDs of all systems was higher than during daytime. All sensors performed worst in hypoglycemia. Performance of the adequately calibrated Medtronic system outperformed the factory-calibrated sensors. For clinical practice, it is important to adequately train children with T1D and families in the correct procedures for sensors that require calibrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.