ArticleThe oncologist2021
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Origin: Retrospective Molecular Classification Considering the CUPISCO Study Design.
Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03498521 (A Phase II, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapy or Cancer Immunotherapy Guided by Genomic Profiling Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary Site Who Have Received Three Cycles of Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Targeted Therapy or Cancer Immunotherapy Guided by Genomic Profiling Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary Site Who Have Received Three Cycles of Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for cancer of unknown primary (update 2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Guideline
- Systematic literature review of the epidemiology of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase positive solid tumor sites.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- SEOM-GECOD clinical guideline for unknown primary cancer (2021).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022Guideline
- Anti-PD-1 plus nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab for second-line treatment of cancer of unknown primary (Fudan CUP-002): a phase II trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Nivolumab and ipilimumab in recurrent or refractory cancer of unknown primary: a phase II trial.Nature communications · 2023Trial
- A prospective national precision medicine trial evaluating the feasibility of blood-based molecular profiling in patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP-COMP).British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Brain Metastases from Unknown Primary Tumors: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Expert consensus on the detection and clinical application of tumor mutational burden.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Prolonged Diagnostic Latency and Long-term Surveillance in Anti-Ri Antibody-positive Opsoclonus-myoclonus Syndrome with Carcinoma of Unknown Primary.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Molecular-Guided Precision Oncology in Cancer of Unknown Primary: A State-of-the-Art Perspective.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Rethinking cancer of unknown primary: from diagnostic challenge to targeted treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer of unknown primary: a multi-center retrospective study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Evolution in the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary: a multicenter Canadian analysis.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Article
- Advancements in Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Era of Precision Medicine.MedComm · 2025Review
- Impact of whole genome sequencing on the care pathway for patients with cancer of unknown primary.ESMO open · 2025Article
- Tumour mutational burden: clinical utility, challenges and emerging improvements.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- PD-L1 expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer of unknown primary site.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) accounts for 2%-5% of newly diagnosed advanced malignancies, with chemotherapy as the standard of care. CUPISCO (NCT03498521) is an ongoing randomized trial using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to assign patients with CUP to targeted or immunotherapy treatment arms based on genomic profiling. We performed a retrospective analysis of CUP cases referred for CGP to determine how many were potentially eligible for enrollment into an experimental CUPISCO arm. MATERIALS AND
methodsCentrally reviewed adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated CUP specimens in the FoundationCore database were analyzed using the hybrid capture-based FoundationOne CDx assay (mean coverage, >600×). Presence of genomic alterations, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutational burden (TMB), genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity were determined.
resultsA total of 96 of 303 patients (31.7%) could be matched to an experimental CUPISCO arm. Key genomic alterations included ERBB2 (7.3%), PIK3CA (6.3%), NF1 (5.6%), NF2 (4.6%), BRAF (4.3%), IDH1 (3.3%), PTEN, FGFR2, EGFR (3.6% each), MET (4.3%), CDK6 (3.0%), FBXW7, CDK4 (2.3% each), IDH2, RET, ROS1, NTRK (1.0% each), and ALK (0.7%). Median TMB was 3.75 mutations per megabase of DNA; 34 patients (11.6%) had a TMB ≥16 mutations per megabase. Three patients (1%) had high MSI, and 42 (14%) displayed high PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score ≥50%). gLOH could be assessed in 199 of 303 specimens; 19.6% had a score of >16%.
conclusionsThirty-two percent of patients would have been eligible for targeted therapy in CUPISCO. Future studies, including additional biomarkers such as PD-L1 positivity and gLOH, may identify a greater proportion potentially benefiting from CGP-informed treatment. Clinical trial identification number. NCT03498521 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings of this retrospective analysis of carcinoma of unknown primary origin (CUP) cases validate the experimental treatment arms being used in the CUPISCO study (NCT03498521), an ongoing randomized trial using comprehensive genomic profiling to assign patients with CUP to targeted or immunotherapy treatment arms based on the presence of pathogenic genomic alterations. The findings also suggest that future studies including additional biomarkers and treatment arms, such as programmed death-ligand 1 positivity and genomic loss of heterozygosity, may identify a greater proportion of patients with CUP potentially benefiting from comprehensive genomic profiling-informed treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.