Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219605›Full record

SynthesisJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2021

Factors facilitating or hindering meaningful staff-client interactions in people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour: A systematic mixed studies review using thematic synthesis.

M A G Simons, R Koordeman, A P A M Willems, M Hermsen, L M Rooijackers, R Otten

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M A G SimonsResearch and Development, Pluryn, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-8799
R KoordemanResearch and Development, Pluryn, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-7345
A P A M WillemsCentre of Expertise, Koraal, Heel, the Netherlands.
M HermsenResearch Centre for Social Support and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
L M RooijackersResearch and Development, Pluryn, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
R OttenResearch and Development, Pluryn, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-5875

Funding

ZonMw 845004012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInteractions with professional caregivers affect the quality of support and life of people with intellectual disabilities and contribute to the occurrence of challenging behaviour. The present literature review provides an overview of factors facilitating or hindering meaningful staff-client interactions in people with borderline to profound intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour.

methodDatabase searches, reference list and citation screening, and expert consultations were undertaken. A thematic synthesis of 28 studies was performed.

resultsFactors were identified at the client (i.e. behaviour, emotions and (dis)abilities), staff (i.e. interactive principles, knowledge, psychological resources, attributions, attitudes and (coping with) emotions) and context levels (i.e. group size, team and organization).

conclusionsThe present overview provides insights into factors that facilitate or hinder meaningful staff-client interactions with people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour. The results support the need to combine client, staff and contextual factors when considering staff-client interactions in research and practice.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityAttitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversEmotionsHumansProfessional-Patient Relationschallenging behaviourclient interactionintellectual disabilityprofessional caregiversstaff

Identifiers

PMID33219605
PMCPMC7894474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.