Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219465›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020

Diversity and Inclusion in the American Legal Profession: Workplace Accommodations for Lawyers with Disabilities and Lawyers Who Identify as LGBTQ.

Peter Blanck, Fitore Hyseni, Fatma Altunkol Wise

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lesbian and Gay Population, Work Experience, and Well-Being: A Ten-Year Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On the Importance of the Americans with Disabilities Act at 30.Journal of disability policy studies · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The disclosure dilemma: requesting accommodations for chronic pain in job interviews.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Disability and remote work during the pandemic with implications for cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter BlanckBurton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA. pblanck@syr.edu.
Fitore HyseniBurton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Fatma Altunkol WiseBurton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Syracuse University · US

Funding

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Grant #90RTEM0006-01-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWorkplace accommodations, vital for employees with disabilities, promote diversity and inclusion efforts in organizations. This article examines who requests accommodations and who is more likely to have requests granted. We investigate the roles of individual characteristics and their intersection, including disability, sexual orientation, gender, race/ethnicity, and age.

methodsUsing data from a national survey of U.S. lawyers, we estimate the odds of requesting accommodations and having the requests approved. We also estimate differences in odds according to individual characteristics, adjusting for control variables.

resultsPersonal identity factors, such as disability status, gender, and age, predict requests for accommodations. Odds of requesting accommodations were higher for women and people with disabilities as compared to men and those without disabilities, but lower for older individuals. Odds of requesting accommodations were higher for an older population segment-older lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) lawyers-than for younger lawyers. Accommodations were granted differentially to individuals with multiple marginalized identities. Counter to predictions, being a person with a disability is negatively associated with having an accommodation granted. Older lawyers generally have higher odds of having accommodations granted, but odds for groups such as women and racial/ethnic minorities decline with age. LGBQ lawyers who are racial minorities have lower odds than White LGBQ lawyers of having their accommodations granted. Longer tenure increases the odds of requesting accommodations. Working for a private organization decreases the odds; working for a large organization generally increases the odds.

conclusionsThose most needing accommodations, such as lawyers with disabilities and women, are more likely to request accommodations. Disabled lawyers, older women lawyers, older racial/ethnic minority lawyers, and LGBQ minority lawyers have relatively low odds of having requests granted. The results highlight the need to consider intersectional identities in the accommodation process.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEthnicityFemaleHumansLawyersMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsUnited StatesWorkplaceYoung AdultDiscriminationLawyersLGBTQPeople with disabilitiesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID33219465
PMCPMC7678776
OpenAlexW3100090100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.