ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021
Current methods for diagnosis of human coronaviruses: pros and cons.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a paper-based fluorescent carbon quantum dots MIPs sensor for selective detection of lumpy skin disease virus.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Device-Based Virus Detection and Quantification in Future Diagnostic Research: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.Biosensors · 2023Review
- CRISPR-Cas-based techniques for pathogen detection: Retrospect, recent advances, and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2023Review
- Superior possibilities and upcoming horizons for nanoscience in COVID-19: noteworthy approach for effective diagnostics and management of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.Chemicke zvesti · 2023Review
- A Study of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by the Use of Electrochemiluminescent Biosensor Based on Asymmetric Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification Strategy.IEEE sensors journal · 2023Article
- Evaluation of ten (10) SARS-CoV-2 rapid serological tests in comparison with WANTAI SARS-CoV-2 ab ELISA in Burkina Faso, West Africa.Virology journal · 2023Article
- Current and emerging trends in techniques for plant pathogen detection.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Assessment of antibody dynamics and neutralizing activity using serological assay after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination.PloS one · 2023Article
- Advances in rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 by mass spectrometry.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022Review
- Interlaboratory Performance of a Real-Time PCR Method for Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kits.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022Article
- Review
- Recent advances in carbon quantum dots for virus detection, as well as inhibition and treatment of viral infection.Nano convergence · 2022Review
- A Study of the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 ORF1ab Gene by the Use of Electrochemiluminescent Biosensor Based on Dual-Probe Hybridization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Rapid Detection of COVID-19 Viral RNA in Human Saliva Using Electrical Double Layer-Gated Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensors.Advanced materials technologies · 2022Article
- Demographic, Virological Characteristics and Prognosis of Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients in South China.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Performance Evaluation of a Novel Ultrafast Molecular Diagnostic Device Integrated With Microfluidic Chips and Dual Temperature Modules.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Influenza A, Influenza B, and SARS-CoV-2 Similarities and Differences - A Focus on Diagnosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- The significance of advanced COVID-19 diagnostic testing in pandemic control measures.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current global fight against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to flatten the transmission curve is put forth by the World Health Organization (WHO) as there is no immediate diagnosis or cure for COVID-19 so far. In order to stop the spread, researchers worldwide are working around the clock aiming to develop reliable tools for early diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) understanding the infection path and mechanisms. Currently, nucleic acid-based molecular diagnosis (real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test) is considered the gold standard for early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. Antibody-based serology detection is ineffective for the purpose of early diagnosis, but a potential tool for serosurveys, providing people with immune certificates for clearance from COVID-19 infection. Meanwhile, there are various blooming methods developed these days. In this review, we summarise different types of coronavirus discovered which can be transmitted between human beings. Methods used for diagnosis of the discovered human coronavirus (SARS, MERS, COVID-19) including nucleic acid detection, gene sequencing, antibody detection, antigen detection, and clinical diagnosis are presented. Their merits, demerits and prospects are discussed which can help the researchers to develop new generation of advanced diagnostic tools for accurate and effective control of human coronavirus transmission in the communities and hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.