ReviewJournal of neurology2022
Placebo response in degenerative cerebellar ataxias: a descriptive review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of noninvasive brain stimulation for patients with cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Therapeutic Misestimation in Patients with Degenerative Ataxia: Lessons from a Randomized Controlled Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023Trial
- Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Trial
- Domain Specific Placebo Response in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- L-arginine in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- SARA captures disparate progression and responsiveness in spinocerebellar ataxias.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- 4-Aminopyridine improves real-life gait performance in SCA27B on a single-subject level: a prospective n-of-1 treatment experience.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Placebo response in degenerative cerebellar ataxias (CAs) has never been studied despite the large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted. In this descriptive review, we aimed to examine the placebo response in patients with CAs. We performed a literature search on PubMed for RCTs on CAs that were published from 1977 to January 2020 and collected data on the changes from the baseline to the endpoint on various objective ataxia-associated clinical rating scales. We reviewed 56 clinical trials, finally including 35 parallel-group studies and excluding 21 cross-over studies. The included studies were categorized as follows: (1) studies showing significant improvements in one or more ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 3); (2) studies reporting individual placebo responders with improvements in one or more ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 5)-the overall proportion of placebo responders was 31.9%; (3) studies showing mean changes in the direction of improvement in at least one ataxia scale in the placebo groups, though not statistically significant (n = 19); (4) studies showing no placebo response in any of the ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 4); (5) studies where data on the placebo groups were unavailable (n = 9). This review demonstrated the placebo response in patients with CAs on various objective ataxia scales. Our study emphasizes that the placebo response should be considered when designing, analyzing, and interpreting clinical trials and in clinical practice in CA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33219422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.