Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219422›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2022

Placebo response in degenerative cerebellar ataxias: a descriptive review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Ji-Hyun Choi, Chaewon Shin, Han-Joon Kim, Beomseok Jeon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Therapeutic Misestimation in Patients with Degenerative Ataxia: Lessons from a Randomized Controlled Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Trial
  3. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ji-Hyun ChoiDepartment of Neurology and Movement Disorder Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Chaewon ShinDepartment of Neurology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-si, South Korea.
Han-Joon KimDepartment of Neurology and Movement Disorder Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. movement@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8219-9663
Beomseok JeonDepartment of Neurology and Movement Disorder Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placebo response in degenerative cerebellar ataxias (CAs) has never been studied despite the large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted. In this descriptive review, we aimed to examine the placebo response in patients with CAs. We performed a literature search on PubMed for RCTs on CAs that were published from 1977 to January 2020 and collected data on the changes from the baseline to the endpoint on various objective ataxia-associated clinical rating scales. We reviewed 56 clinical trials, finally including 35 parallel-group studies and excluding 21 cross-over studies. The included studies were categorized as follows: (1) studies showing significant improvements in one or more ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 3); (2) studies reporting individual placebo responders with improvements in one or more ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 5)-the overall proportion of placebo responders was 31.9%; (3) studies showing mean changes in the direction of improvement in at least one ataxia scale in the placebo groups, though not statistically significant (n = 19); (4) studies showing no placebo response in any of the ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 4); (5) studies where data on the placebo groups were unavailable (n = 9). This review demonstrated the placebo response in patients with CAs on various objective ataxia scales. Our study emphasizes that the placebo response should be considered when designing, analyzing, and interpreting clinical trials and in clinical practice in CA patients.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaFriedreich AtaxiaAtaxiaCross-Over StudiesHumansPlacebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCerebellar ataxiaDegenerativePlacebo responseRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.