Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219416›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2021

Bi-national Review of Phaeochromocytoma Care: Is ICU Admission Always Necessary?

Alexander J Papachristos, Tiffany J Cherry, Munyaradzi G Nyandoro, Dean Lisewski, Sarah-Jayne Stevenson, Philippa Mercer, Suren Subramaniam, Stan B Sidhu, Mark S Sywak, Nicholas D A Blefari and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effect of all-in-one nursing model on ICU ventilator-associated pneumonia.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander J PapachristosEndocrine Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St. Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia. alex_papa4@hotmail.com.
Tiffany J CherryEndocrine Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St. Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia.
Munyaradzi G NyandoroDepartment of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Melville, WA, Australia.
Dean LisewskiDepartment of General Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Melville, WA, Australia.
Sarah-Jayne StevensonDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury DHB, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Philippa MercerDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury DHB, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Suren SubramaniamEndocrine Surgery Unit, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stan B SidhuEndocrine Surgery Unit, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mark S SywakEndocrine Surgery Unit, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas D A BlefariDivision of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Christine J O'NeillDivision of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Justin S GundaraDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery, Logan Hospital, Logan, QLD, Australia.
Julie A MillerEndocrine Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St. Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia.
Christchurch Hospital · NZFiona Stanley Hospital · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AUJohn Hunter Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-operative management after phaeochromocytoma resection includes monitoring of blood pressure and blood sugar, and vigilance for haemorrhage. Guidelines recommend 24 h of continuous blood pressure monitoring, usually necessitating HDU/ICU admission. We hypothesised that most patients undergoing phaeochromocytoma resection do not require post-operative HDU/ICU admission. We aim to describe current Australian and New Zealand perioperative management of phaeochromocytoma and determine whether it is safe to omit HDU/ICU care for most patients.

methodsWe collected retrospective data on patients undergoing excision of phaeochromocytoma in 12 centres around Australia and New Zealand between 2007 and 2019. Data collected included preoperative medical management, anaesthetic management, vasopressor support, HDU/ICU admission and complications.

resultsA total of 223 patients were included in the study, 173 (77%) of whom were admitted to HDU/ICU post-operatively. The group of patients treated in ICU was similar to the group of patients treated on the ward in terms of demographic and tumour characteristics, and there were significant differences in the proportion of patients admitted to HDU/ICU between centres. Of patients admitted to ICU, 71 (41%) received vasopressor support. This was weaned within 24 h in 55 (77%) patients. Patients with larger tumours (> 6 cm) and a transfusion requirement are more likely to require prolonged inotropic support. Among patients admitted to the ward, there were no complications that required escalation of care.

conclusionsAlthough not widespread practice in Australia and New Zealand, it appears safe for the majority of patients undergoing minimally invasive resection of phaeochromocytoma to be admitted to the ward post-operatively.

Indexed as

Adrenal Gland NeoplasmsIntensive Care UnitsPheochromocytomaAustraliaHumansNew ZealandRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33219416
OpenAlexW3102196317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.