Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219382›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2021

Remote Ecological Momentary Testing of Learning and Memory in Adults With Serious Mental Illness.

Emma M Parrish, Snigdha Kamarsu, Philip D Harvey, Amy Pinkham, Colin A Depp, Raeanne C Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma M ParrishSan Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA.
Snigdha KamarsuStein Institute for Research on Aging, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Philip D HarveyMiller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Amy PinkhamDepartment of Psychology, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX.
Colin A DeppStein Institute for Research on Aging, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Raeanne C MooreStein Institute for Research on Aging, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.

Funding

FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
Introspective Accuracy, Bias, and Everyday Functioning in Severe Mental IllnessR01MH112620 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PINKHAM, AMY · 2018 to 2021
$3.2M
Real-Time Mobile Cognitive Tests for Bipolar Disorder ResearchR21MH116104 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MOORE, RAEANNE CRISTINE · 2018 to 2019
$426k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112620NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH116104NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphone-based ecological mobile cognitive tests (EMCTs) can measure cognitive abilities in the real world, complementing traditional neuropsychological assessments. We evaluated the validity of an EMCT of recognition memory designed for use with people with serious mental illness, as well as relevant contextual influences on performance. Participants with schizophrenia (SZ), schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder (BD) completed in-lab assessments of memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, HVLT), other cognitive abilities, functional capacity, and symptoms, followed by 30 days of EMCTs during which they completed our Mobile Variable Difficulty List Memory Test (VLMT) once every other day (3 trials per session). List length on the VLMT altered between 6, 12, and 18 items. On average, participants completed 75.3% of EMCTs. Overall performance on VLMT 12 and 18 items was positively correlated with HVLT (ρ = 0.52, P < .001). People with BD performed better on the VLMT than people with SZ. Intraindividual variability on the VLMT was more specifically associated with HVLT than nonmemory tests and not associated with symptoms. Performance during experienced distraction, low effort, and out of the home location was reduced yet still correlated with the in-lab HVLT. The VLMT converged with in-lab memory assessment, demonstrating variability within person and by different contexts. Ambulatory cognitive testing on participants' personal mobile devices offers more a cost-effective and "ecologically valid" measurement of real-world cognitive performance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBipolar DisorderCognitive DysfunctionEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMemory and Learning TestsMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsPsychotic DisordersRecognition, PsychologyReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniabipolar disorderecological momentary assessmentmemoryremote cognitive testingschizoaffective disorderschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33219382
PMCPMC8084440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.