Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219297›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Clinico-pathologic predictors of patterns of residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Ricardo G Pastorello, Alison Laws, Samantha Grossmith, Claire King, Monica McGrath, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Tari A King, Stuart J Schnitt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo G PastorelloDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-2437
Alison LawsDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9933-6705
Samantha GrossmithDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Claire KingDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Monica McGrathDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth A MittendorfDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tari A King *Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Stuart J Schnitt *Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. sschnitt@bwh.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) who do not experience a pathologic complete response (pCR), the pattern of residual disease in the breast varies. Pre-treatment clinico-pathologic features that predict the pattern of residual tumor are not well established. To investigate this issue, we performed a detailed review of histologic sections of the post-treatment surgical specimens for 665 patients with stage I-III breast cancer treated with NAC followed by surgery from 2004 to 2014 and for whom slides of the post-NAC surgical specimen were available for review. This included 242 (36.4%) patients with hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- cancers, 216 (32.5%) with HER2+ tumors, and 207 (31.1%) with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Slide review was blinded to pre-treatment clinico-pathologic features. pCR was achieved in 7.9%, 37.0%, and 37.7%, of HR+/HER2- cancers, HER2+ cancers, and TNBC respectively (p < 0.001). Among 389 patients with residual invasive cancer in whom the pattern of residual disease could be assessed, 287 (73.8%) had a scattered pattern and 102 (26.2%) had a circumscribed pattern. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, there was a significant association between tumor subtype and pattern of response. Among patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, 89.4% had a scattered pattern and only 10.6% had a circumscribed pattern. In contrast, among those with TNBC 52.8% had a circumscribed pattern and 47.2% had a scattered pattern (p < 0.001). In addition to subtype, histologic grade and tumor size at presentation were also significantly related to the pattern of residual disease in multivariate analysis, with lower grade and larger size each associated with a scattered response pattern (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively). A better understanding of the relationship between pre-treatment clinico-pathologic features of the tumor and pattern of residual disease may be of value for helping to guide post-chemotherapy surgical management.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33219297
OpenAlexW3099071207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.