Observational studyScientific reports2020
Two-year outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept in a Swiss routine treat and extend regimen for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of brolucizumab and ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: insights from a case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- One-Year Real-World Outcomes of Aflibercept 8 mg in Treatment-Naïve Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Swiss Retina Research Network Report.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Treatment regimens for optimising outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Two-Year Switzerland Cohort Results from a Global Observational Study Investigating Proactive Dosing with Intravitreal Aflibercept 2 mg in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term surveillance provides real-world evidences of safety and effectiveness in intravitreal aflibercept treatment for age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Brolucizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: Ophthalmology and Diabetology Treatment Aspects.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this observational study was to assess the use and outcome of intravitreal aflibercept in a treat and extend regimen in treatment-naïve neovascular AMD patients in routine practice. This both retrospective and prospective study was conducted in four larger Swiss retina clinics (ASTERIA study). The primary endpoint was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS letters from baseline to 12 months. Between December 2017 and August 2018, 160 patients were included. For patients with available data, the mean change in BCVA was + 8.4 (± 14.4) letters at month 12 (n = 139) and + 5.0 (± 11.4) letters at month 24 (n = 95). A mean number of 8.3 (± 2.4) injections were administered within the first year and 5.4 (± 2.9) injections during the second year. On average, the observed treatment interval at month 12 was 63.3 (± 22.0) days and increased to 69.1 (± 28.6) days at month 24. For 37% of the patients, a treatment interval ≥ 12 weeks was attained at month 24. In conclusion, intravitreal aflibercept in a Swiss real-life treat and extend regimen resulted in comparable anatomic and functional outcomes as were observed in the prospective registration trials of aflibercept for nAMD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.