Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219219›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Distinct dynamics of social motivation drive differential social behavior in laboratory rat and mouse strains.

Shai Netser, Ana Meyer, Hen Magalnik, Asaph Zylbertal, Shani Haskal de la Zerda, Mayan Briller, Alexander Bizer, Valery Grinevich, Shlomo Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shai NetserSagol Department of Neurobiology, the Integrated Brain and Behavior Research Center (IBBRC), University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.
Ana MeyerDepartment of Neuropeptide Research in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, J5, 69159, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0248-032X
Hen MagalnikSagol Department of Neurobiology, the Integrated Brain and Behavior Research Center (IBBRC), University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8934-1316
Asaph ZylbertalDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, WCE1 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9789-2468
Shani Haskal de la ZerdaSagol Department of Neurobiology, the Integrated Brain and Behavior Research Center (IBBRC), University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4770-3219
Mayan BrillerSagol Department of Neurobiology, the Integrated Brain and Behavior Research Center (IBBRC), University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6079-0660
Alexander BizerFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-6448
Valery GrinevichDepartment of Neuropeptide Research in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, J5, 69159, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6337-8866
Shlomo WagnerSagol Department of Neurobiology, the Integrated Brain and Behavior Research Center (IBBRC), University of Haifa, Haifa, 3498838, Israel. shlomow@research.haifa.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-0752
University of Haifa · ILHeidelberg University · DEIBM Research - Haifa · ILUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice and rats are widely used to explore mechanisms of mammalian social behavior in health and disease, raising the question whether they actually differ in their social behavior. Here we address this question by directly comparing social investigation behavior between two mouse and rat strains used most frequently for behavioral studies and as models of neuropathological conditions: C57BL/6 J mice and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. Employing novel experimental systems for behavioral analysis of both subjects and stimuli during the social preference test, we reveal marked differences in behavioral dynamics between the strains, suggesting stronger and faster induction of social motivation in SD rats. These different behavioral patterns, which correlate with distinctive c-Fos expression in social motivation-related brain areas, are modified by competition with non-social rewarding stimuli, in a strain-specific manner. Thus, these two strains differ in their social behavior, which should be taken into consideration when selecting an appropriate model organism.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainImmunohistochemistryLimbic SystemMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalModels, TheoreticalMotivationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardSpecies SpecificityProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos

Identifiers

PMID33219219
PMCPMC7679456
OpenAlexW3100180752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.