Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219084›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Perspectives on Dermoscopy in the Primary Care Setting.

Natalie M Williams, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Elizabeth Seiverling, Richard Usatine, Darren Tsang, Natalia Jaimes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie M WilliamsFrom the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
Ashfaq A MarghoobFrom the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
Elizabeth SeiverlingFrom the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
Richard UsatineFrom the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
Darren TsangFrom the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ).
Natalia JaimesFrom the Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NMW, DT, NJ); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME (ES); Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RU); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ). njaimes@med.miami.edu.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDermoscopy is a noninvasive, in vivo imaging technique that allows for the visualization of subsurface skin structures. In recent years, several education interventions have incorporated dermoscopy in the primary care setting to improve skin cancer detection. We aim to describe the perspectives, attitudes, and interest of primary care physicians (PCPs) regarding dermoscopy.

methodsPCPs associated with academic institutions completed an anonymous survey emailed to faculty and resident listservs. The survey consisted of 23 questions related to dermoscopy.

resultsA total of 156 PCPs completed the questionnaire. Few PCPs reported having access to a dermatoscope (16%), using it regularly (9%), or having received training (15%). The most common reasons for not using a dermatoscope were the lack of access to the device (85%), followed by the lack of training (76%). However, the majority view dermoscopy as a valuable tool in primary care and are interested in receiving training (87%), particularly with a hands-on approach.

conclusionOur sample of PCPs in the United States showed that although few use dermoscopy, most perceive it as a useful tool, particularly family medicine physicians. The main reported barriers preventing its use included the lack of training and poor access to dermatoscopes. The vast majority of PCPs in our sample want to be trained in dermoscopy, thereby providing an opportunity for educational initiatives that take into account the barriers and preferred learning strategies.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPhysicians, Primary CareSkin NeoplasmsDermoscopyHumansPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesDermoscopyFamily PhysiciansPrimary Care PhysiciansPrimary Health CareSkin CancerSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33219084
PMCPMC9121797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.