Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33219074›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Barriers to Patient Portal Access and Use: Evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Sherine El-Toukhy, Alejandra Méndez, Shavonne Collins, Eliseo J Pérez-Stable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The impact of early oral anticancer medication monitoring through electronic patient assessments.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Before the examination: digital check-in].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Accessing Patient Portals: Some Patients Want a Helping Hand.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Journal of health communication · 2026
    Article
  17. More Older Adults Try Patient Portals in Recent Years, but Many Don't Continue: A Meta-Analysis.Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sherine El-ToukhyFrom the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET, AM); School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis (AM); School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (SC); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJPS); Office of the Director, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD (EJPS). sherine.el-toukhy@nih.gov.
Alejandra MéndezFrom the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET, AM); School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis (AM); School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (SC); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJPS); Office of the Director, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD (EJPS).
Shavonne CollinsFrom the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET, AM); School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis (AM); School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (SC); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJPS); Office of the Director, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD (EJPS).
Eliseo J Pérez-StableFrom the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET, AM); School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis (AM); School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (SC); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJPS); Office of the Director, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD (EJPS).

Funding

Digital Health and Health Disparities Research LabZIAMD000011 · NIMHD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES · PI EL-TOUKHY, SHERINE · 2018 to 2025
$3.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MD000011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient access to their medical records through patient portals (PPs) facilitates information exchange and provision of quality health care. Understanding factors that characterize patients with limited access to and use of PPs is needed.

methodsData were from the 2017-2018 Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycles 1 and 2, a nationally representative survey of US adults ≥ 18 years old (n = 6789). Weighted multivariate logistic regressions modeled the associations between patient characteristics and access to, facilitators of use, and use of PPs and their functions.

resultsIndividuals without (vs with) a regular doctor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.5) or health insurance (aOR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.7), those with high school (aOR 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.5) or with vocational/some college (aOR, 0.5; CI, 04.-0.7) education (vs college/postgraduate), or those with limited English proficiency (vs those who speak English very well) (aOR, 0.7; CI, 0.5-0.9) were less likely to report accessing their personal medical records. Women (vs men) were more likely to report accessing their medical records (aOR, 1.5; CI, 1.2-1.8). Similar patterns were found for PPs access and facilitators of use. Less consistent associations emerged between patient characteristics and use of PP functionalities.

conclusionsPP access and use are low. Having a primary care clinician, patient's educational attainment, and being a woman were factors associated with PP access and use, but not race/ethnicity. Once access was achieved, use of PP functionalities was generally uniform across demographic segments. Facilitating PP access and use among all patient populations is warranted.

Indexed as

Patient PortalsAdultEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleOdds RatioPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesElectronic Health RecordsInformation TechnologyLimited English ProficiencyLogistic ModelsMedical InformaticsPatient PortalsPersonal Health RecordsPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33219074
PMCPMC7849369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.