Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33218884›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology nursing2020

Advancing Oncology Nursing Practice Through the Adoption of Patient Monitoring Digital Tools.

Christina M Wilson, Kathi Mooney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology nursing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The utility of website-based quality improvement tools for health professionals: a systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How technology can improve communication and health outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: an integrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  9. Barriers to Adherence to Cancer Treatments Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christina M WilsonUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: christina.wilson@utah.edu.
Kathi MooneyUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT; Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer, Caregiving and End-of-Life CareT32NR013456 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A, MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this paper is to describe the use of oncology digital symptom monitoring and patient self-management coaching tools, how nurses and nurse practitioners (NPs) can optimize their use as an adjunct in improving oncology care and discuss issues and strategies needed for adoption within a variety of clinical settings. DATA SOURCES: A review of the research literature regarding digital health in oncology symptom management in PubMed provided the foundation for this paper.

conclusionDigital symptom monitoring technology provides a variety of opportunities for oncology nurses and NPs to efficiently extend and improve symptom management in multiple settings including cancer patients at home between clinic visits, at clinic visits, and during inpatient stays. Digital monitoring and patient engagement make possible frequent symptom assessments, just-in-time personalized self-management reinforcement, and judiciously alert nurses and NPs about key times for follow-up with patients supported with evidenced-based guidelines. Oncology nurses at all levels have the opportunity to be leaders in the adoption and expansion of digital tools to enhance their practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Oncology nurses and NPs can lead practice changes that improve patient outcomes through understanding and shaping the use of digital tools.

Indexed as

HumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsNurse-Patient RelationsOncology NursingSelf CareSymptom AssessmentTelemedicineDigital healthNursingOncology

Identifiers

PMID33218884
PMCPMC7719070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.