ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2020
Interconnectable solid-liquid protein extraction unit and chip-based dilution for multiplexed consumer immunodiagnostics.
Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smartcard: an integrated approach for contaminant monitoring, from field to laboratory.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Progress and Challenge of Sensors for Dairy Food Safety Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- From Smartphone Lateral Flow Immunoassay Screening to Direct MS Analysis: Development and Validation of a Semi-Quantitative Direct Analysis in Real-Time Mass Spectrometric (DART-MS) Approach to the Analysis of Deoxynivalenol.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Optical Screening Methods for Pesticide Residue Detection in Food Matrices: Advances and Emerging Analytical Trends.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While consumer-focused food analysis is upcoming, the need for multiple sample preparation and handling steps is limiting. On-site and consumer-friendly analysis paradoxically still requires laboratory-based and skill-intensive sample preparation methods. Here, we present a compact, inexpensive, and novel prototype immunosensor combining sample preparation and on-chip reagent storage for multiplex allergen lateral flow immunosensing. Our comprehensive approach paves the way for personalized consumer diagnostics. The prototype allows for handheld solid-liquid extraction, pipette-free on-chip dilution, and adjustment of sample concentrations into the appropriate assay dynamic working range. The disposable and interconnectable homogenizer unit allows for the extraction and 3D-sieve based filtration of allergenic proteins from solid bakery products in 1 min. The homogenizer interconnects with a 3D-printed unibody lab-on-a-chip (ULOC) microdevice, which is used to deliver precise volumes of sample extract to a reagent reservoir. The reagent reservoir is implemented for on-chip storage of carbon nanoparticle labeled antibodies and running buffer for dilution. The handheld prototype allows for total homogenization of solid samples, solid-liquid protein extraction, 3D-printed sieve based filtration, ULOC-enabled dilution, mixing, transport, and smartphone-based detection of hazelnut and peanut allergens in solid bakery products with limited operational complexity. The multiplex lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) detects allergens as low as 0.1 ppm in real bakery products, and the system is already consumer-operable, demonstrating its potential for future citizen science approaches. The designed system is suitable for a wide range of analytical applications outside of food safety, provided an LFIA is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.