ArticleGenome medicine2020
Transparency, trust, and community welfare: towards a precision public health ethics framework for the genomics era.
Article in Genome medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- What psychosocial factors shape HIV testing willingness among Chinese college students? A cross-sectional survey integrating PLS-SEM and fsQCA.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrating ethics into infectious disease graduate training: a multidimensional framework for public health practice.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- The ethical aspects of human organ-on-chip models: A mapping review.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- Ethics and governance challenges related to genomic data sharing in southern Africa: the case of SARS-CoV-2.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Review
- The promise of public health ethics for precision medicine: the case of newborn preventive genomic sequencing.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Trends in Population-Based Studies: Molecular and Digital Epidemiology (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2022Review
- The impact of genomics on precision public health: beyond the pandemic.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Advancing a Data Justice Framework for Public Health Surveillance.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Infectious disease control is experiencing a paradigm shift, as pathogen sequencing technologies and digital applications are increasingly implemented for control of diseases such as tuberculosis, Ebola, and COVID-19. A new ethical framework should be a critical part of this emerging paradigm to ensure that the benefit of precision public health interventions based on advances in genomics research is not outweighed by the risks they pose to individuals, families, and vulnerable segments of the population. We suggest that the ethical framework guiding practice in this domain combines standard precepts from public health ethics with emerging ethics principles from precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.